On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Great, thanks - OK for trunk.
>
> Assuming no problems on the trunk we might want to backport it for
> 4.9.1 in a few weeks.
>
Committed. Thanks.
--
Regards,
Tim Shen
On 24/04/14 11:49 -0400, Tim Shen wrote:
This testcase fails before the patch. Sorry for that.
Great, thanks - OK for trunk.
Assuming no problems on the trunk we might want to backport it for
4.9.1 in a few weeks.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Unless I'm doing something wrong the new tests you added already give
> the right results, do you have a testcase that fails with the current
> code?
This testcase fails before the patch. Sorry for that.
--
Regards,
Tim Shen
commit f333
On 24 April 2014 04:47, Tim Shen wrote:
>> Booted and tested with -m32 and -m64.
>
> I should give an explanation:
>
> When traversing a graph in _M_clone(), it should stop at a node with
> id _M_end. However, if _M_end has other outgoing edge (_M_alt), the
> edge should be concerned too. So this p
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Tim Shen wrote:
> Booted and tested with -m32 and -m64.
I should give an explanation:
When traversing a graph in _M_clone(), it should stop at a node with
id _M_end. However, if _M_end has other outgoing edge (_M_alt), the
edge should be concerned too. So this p
