Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:19:32 +0200
From: Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz
Yes, if we scan assembler, we likely want -fno-fat-lto-objects.
then IIUC you need to patch *all* torture tests that use
scan-assembler and scan-assembler-not. Alternatively, patch
somewhere else, like not
On 21 Oct 2011, at 10:31, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:19:32 +0200
From: Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz
Yes, if we scan assembler, we likely want -fno-fat-lto-objects.
then IIUC you need to patch *all* torture tests that use
scan-assembler and scan-assembler-not. Alternatively,
Iain Sandoe develo...@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk writes:
It looks like the gnat testsuite is also broken - but HP's fix doesn't
recover that.
.. will try and take a look - but short on time today,
I think I see what's going on: in gnat.log, I find
Running
If running the gnat.dg testsuite, lib/gcc-dg.exp is now calling
check_linker_plugin_available early, which ultimately calls
${tool}_target_compile. For all languages but Ada,
${tool}_target_compile can compile .c files just fine, but
gnat_target_compile (which uses gnatmake) cannot, so it
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:44:15 +0200
From: Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz
I also noticed that tests scanning output of late optimization passes are
now getting UNRESOLVED state with slim LTO. We don't really lose coverage
here because we test fat LTO with the other compilation, but probably
Meh... Please no, this was the kind of scatter-patches my patch
aimed to avoid... for example, easy to miss some tests.
Instead, on top of my patch, just copy the
scan-assembler_required_options proc to a
scan-tree-dump_required_options. ...no wait, should forcing
fat-lto be done for
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 20:34:05 +0200
From: Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz
I guess we could make ipa-dump/rtl-dump/tree-dump scanning to disable fat lto
and introduce variants intended to scan late tree dumps and ipa execution
dumps...
Ok, sounds like a plan. Are there any such
