On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 10:54:51AM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> > I'm guessing the keyword here is 'trait' which I'm guessing is different
> > from a omp declare simd directive, which is why it's not required to
> > have a simdlen clause in an omp declare simd (see Jakub's comment).
>
>
"Andre Vieira (lists)" writes:
> On 20/04/2023 17:13, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> "Andre Vieira (lists)" writes:
>>> On 20/04/2023 15:51, Richard Sandiford wrote:
"Andre Vieira (lists)" writes:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a series of patches/RFCs to implement support in GCC to be
On 20/04/2023 17:13, Richard Sandiford wrote:
"Andre Vieira (lists)" writes:
On 20/04/2023 15:51, Richard Sandiford wrote:
"Andre Vieira (lists)" writes:
Hi all,
This is a series of patches/RFCs to implement support in GCC to be able
to target AArch64's libmvec functions that will
"Andre Vieira (lists)" writes:
> On 20/04/2023 15:51, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> "Andre Vieira (lists)" writes:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> This is a series of patches/RFCs to implement support in GCC to be able
>>> to target AArch64's libmvec functions that will be/are being added to glibc.
>>> We
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 04:22:50PM +0100, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
> > I don't see a good reason for dropping the extension("scalable").
> > The problem is that since the base spec requires a simdlen clause,
> > GCC should in general raise an error if simdlen is omitted.
> Where can you find
On 20/04/2023 15:51, Richard Sandiford wrote:
"Andre Vieira (lists)" writes:
Hi all,
This is a series of patches/RFCs to implement support in GCC to be able
to target AArch64's libmvec functions that will be/are being added to glibc.
We have chosen to use the omp pragma '#pragma omp
"Andre Vieira (lists)" writes:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a series of patches/RFCs to implement support in GCC to be able
> to target AArch64's libmvec functions that will be/are being added to glibc.
> We have chosen to use the omp pragma '#pragma omp declare variant ...'
> with a simd construct as
