Hi!
On 2021-04-09T13:00:39+0200, I wrote:
> On 2021-03-25T12:02:15+0100, I wrote:
>> On 2021-03-11T17:52:55+0100, I wrote:
>>> On 2021-02-23T22:52:38+0100, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
>>> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 09:43:51PM +, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
> On 19/02/2021 7:12
Hi!
On 2021-03-25T12:02:15+0100, I wrote:
> On 2021-03-11T17:52:55+0100, I wrote:
>> On 2021-02-23T22:52:38+0100, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 09:43:51PM +, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
On 19/02/2021 7:12 pm, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
> I have
Hi!
On 2021-03-11T17:52:55+0100, I wrote:
> On 2021-02-23T22:52:38+0100, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 09:43:51PM +, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
>>> On 19/02/2021 7:12 pm, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
>>> > I have included the current state of my patch. All
Hi!
On 2021-02-23T22:52:38+0100, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 09:43:51PM +, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
>> On 19/02/2021 7:12 pm, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
>> > I have included the current state of my patch. All task-detach-* tests
>> > pass when executed
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 04:21:31PM +, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
> Reversing the order reduces the hole to 3 bytes:
>
> size_t num_dependees;/*80 8 */
> union {
> gomp_sem_t * completion_sem; /*88 8 */
>
On 24/02/2021 7:46 pm, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
@@ -545,8 +548,15 @@ struct gomp_task
entries and the gomp_task in which they reside. */
struct priority_node pnode[3];
- bool detach;
- gomp_sem_t completion_sem;
+ union {
+/* Valid only if deferred_p is false. */
+
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 06:17:01PM +, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
> > 1) while linux --enable-futex and accel gomp_sem_t is small (int), rtems
> > and especially posix gomp_sem_t is large; so while it might be a good
> > idea to inline gomp_sem_t on config/{linux,accel} into the union,
On 22/02/2021 1:49 pm, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
I see three issues with the union of completion_sem and detach_team done
that way.
1) while linux --enable-futex and accel gomp_sem_t is small (int), rtems
and especially posix gomp_sem_t is large; so while it might be a good
idea to inline
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 09:43:51PM +, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
> On 19/02/2021 7:12 pm, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
> > I have included the current state of my patch. All task-detach-* tests
> > pass when executed without offloading or with offloading to GCN, but
> > with offloading to Nvidia,
On 19/02/2021 7:12 pm, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
I have included the current state of my patch. All task-detach-* tests pass when
executed without offloading or with offloading to GCN, but with offloading to
Nvidia, task-detach-6.* hangs consistently but everything else passes (probably
because
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 02:49:44PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> So, I think for the team != gomp_thread ()->ts.team
> && !do_wake
> && gomp_team_barrier_waiting_for_tasks (>barrier)
> && team->task_detach_count == 0
> case, we need to wake up 1 thread anyway and arrange for it to do:
>
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 07:12:42PM +, Kwok Cheung Yeung wrote:
> I have opted for a union of completion_sem (for tasks that are undeferred)
> and a struct gomp_team *detach_team (for deferred tasks) that holds the team
> if the completion event has not yet fulfilled, or NULL if is it. I don't
12 matches
Mail list logo
