Re: [committed] Fix -fstack-check with really big frames on aarch64

2017-06-23 Thread Jeff Law
On 06/23/2017 05:15 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote: > Hi, > > A minor comment at this stage: this new test fails to compile for > thumb-1 targets: > testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20031023-1.c:27:1: sorry, > unimplemented: -fstack-check=specific for Thumb-1 > > for instance on

Re: [committed] Fix -fstack-check with really big frames on aarch64

2017-06-23 Thread Jeff Law
On 06/22/2017 11:28 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:21:15AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: >> +2017-06-22 Jeff Law >> + >> +* gcc.c-torture/compile/stack-check-1.c: New test. >> + >> 2016-06-22 Richard Biener >> >> *

Re: [committed] Fix -fstack-check with really big frames on aarch64

2017-06-23 Thread Christophe Lyon
On 22 June 2017 at 19:21, Jeff Law wrote: > > This time with the test. Just #includes 20031023-1.c with a suitable dg > directive to ensure we compile with -fstack-check. > > I won't be surprised if other targets fail this test. It's a really big > stack frame :-) > > Anyways,

Re: [committed] Fix -fstack-check with really big frames on aarch64

2017-06-22 Thread Mike Stump
On Jun 22, 2017, at 10:21 AM, Jeff Law wrote: > > This time with the test. Just #includes 20031023-1.c with a suitable dg > directive to ensure we compile with -fstack-check. > > I won't be surprised if other targets fail this test. It's a really big > stack frame :-) The

Re: [committed] Fix -fstack-check with really big frames on aarch64

2017-06-22 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:21:15AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > +2017-06-22 Jeff Law > + > + * gcc.c-torture/compile/stack-check-1.c: New test. > + > 2016-06-22 Richard Biener > > * gcc.dg/vect/pr65947-1.c: Remove xfail. > diff --git