On 06/23/2017 05:15 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A minor comment at this stage: this new test fails to compile for
> thumb-1 targets:
> testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20031023-1.c:27:1: sorry,
> unimplemented: -fstack-check=specific for Thumb-1
>
> for instance on
On 06/22/2017 11:28 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:21:15AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>> +2017-06-22 Jeff Law
>> +
>> +* gcc.c-torture/compile/stack-check-1.c: New test.
>> +
>> 2016-06-22 Richard Biener
>>
>> *
On 22 June 2017 at 19:21, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> This time with the test. Just #includes 20031023-1.c with a suitable dg
> directive to ensure we compile with -fstack-check.
>
> I won't be surprised if other targets fail this test. It's a really big
> stack frame :-)
>
> Anyways,
On Jun 22, 2017, at 10:21 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> This time with the test. Just #includes 20031023-1.c with a suitable dg
> directive to ensure we compile with -fstack-check.
>
> I won't be surprised if other targets fail this test. It's a really big
> stack frame :-)
The
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:21:15AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> +2017-06-22 Jeff Law
> +
> + * gcc.c-torture/compile/stack-check-1.c: New test.
> +
> 2016-06-22 Richard Biener
>
> * gcc.dg/vect/pr65947-1.c: Remove xfail.
> diff --git