Diego == Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com writes:
Diego +struct GTY(()) vec_prefix
Diego +{
Diego + unsigned num;
Diego + unsigned alloc;
Diego +};
Diego +
Diego +/* Vector type, user visible. */
Diego +templatetypename T
Diego +struct GTY(()) vec_t
Diego +{
Diego + vec_prefix prefix;
Diego
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Tom Tromey tro...@redhat.com wrote:
Diego == Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com writes:
Diego +struct GTY(()) vec_prefix
Diego +{
Diego + unsigned num;
Diego + unsigned alloc;
Diego +};
Diego +
Diego +/* Vector type, user visible. */
Diego
On 12-05-25 14:27 , Tom Tromey wrote:
Diego == Diego Novillodnovi...@google.com writes:
Diego +struct GTY(()) vec_prefix
Diego +{
Diego + unsigned num;
Diego + unsigned alloc;
Diego +};
Diego +
Diego +/* Vector type, user visible. */
Diego +templatetypename T
Diego +struct GTY(())
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
This series of 3 patches re-implement vec.[ch] in C++.
this is fantastic! The changes look good to me.
-- Gaby
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:16 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Some client code changes were needed:
1- The allocation names 'heap', 'stack' and 'gc' are not embedded in
the type name anymore. They are enum values used as a template
argument for functions like
On 12-05-24 04:20 , Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe this was because of aliasing - you may dig in the svn history
to find out what we miscompiled when not doing this and whether it is
still necessary or not.
On 12-05-24 04:16 , Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Diego Novillodnovi...@google.com wrote:
This series of 3 patches re-implement vec.[ch] in C++.
The main goal of this first step is to minimize changes to client
code. I tried very hard to maintain the existing API.
I have committed these three patches as a single revision r187836 on
cxx-conversion.
I will address further comments to the patch in subsequent changes.
Andrew, if you have some time, could you see if you can recreate that
LTO aliasing failure you were describing earlier?
I may change the
On 5/24/12, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On 12-05-24 04:16 , Richard Guenther wrote:
On May 23, 2012 Diego Novillodnovi...@google.com wrote:
Some client code changes were needed:
1- The allocation names 'heap', 'stack' and 'gc' are not embedded in
the type name anymore. They
On 5/23/12, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
OK for cxx-conversion branch?
LGTM.
--
Lawrence Crowl
10 matches
Mail list logo
