Georg-Johann Lay writes:
> On 04.11.2016 06:18, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
>>
>> Georg-Johann Lay writes:
>>> State of matters is that Binutils support is missing, and if I understand
>>> you
>>> correctly, dg-require is not appropriate to factor out availability of such
>>> features?
>>
>>
On Nov 4, 2016, at 2:35 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>
>> .word .L3-(.L2)
>>
>> which seems wrong, given all the other code-gen. I think this has to be
>> gs(.L3)-(gs(.L2)), no? I tried to get binutils to do that for me directly
>> with a .word and it seemed resistant; which
On 04.11.2016 06:18, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
Georg-Johann Lay writes:
State of matters is that Binutils support is missing, and if I understand you
correctly, dg-require is not appropriate to factor out availability of such
features?
I'll take a stab at adding the missing binutils
On 04.11.2016 03:48, Mike Stump wrote:
On Nov 3, 2016, at 8:25 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
On 28.10.2016 17:58, Mike Stump wrote:
On Oct 27, 2016, at 3:16 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Now imagine some arithmetic like & - & This might result in
one or two stub
Georg-Johann Lay writes:
> On 28.10.2016 17:58, Mike Stump wrote:
>> On Oct 27, 2016, at 3:16 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>>>
>>> Now imagine some arithmetic like & - & This might result in
>>> one or two stub addresses, and difference between such addresses is a
>>> complete
On Nov 3, 2016, at 8:25 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>
> On 28.10.2016 17:58, Mike Stump wrote:
>> On Oct 27, 2016, at 3:16 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>>>
>>> Now imagine some arithmetic like & - & This might result in
>>> one or two stub addresses, and
On 28.10.2016 17:58, Mike Stump wrote:
On Oct 27, 2016, at 3:16 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Now imagine some arithmetic like & - & This might result in
one or two stub addresses, and difference between such addresses is a
complete different thing than the difference between
On Oct 27, 2016, at 3:16 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>
> Now imagine some arithmetic like & - & This might result in one
> or two stub addresses, and difference between such addresses is a complete
> different thing than the difference between the original labels: The result
On 27.10.2016 12:49, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 10/27/2016 12:16 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Now imagine some arithmetic like & - & This might result in
one or two stub addresses, and difference between such addresses is a
complete different thing than the difference between the original
labels:
On 10/27/2016 12:16 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Now imagine some arithmetic like & - & This might result in
one or two stub addresses, and difference between such addresses is a
complete different thing than the difference between the original
labels: The result might differ in absolute value
On 26.10.2016 18:51, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 10/26/2016 04:46 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
+if { [istarget avr-*-*] } {
+# If the value of a label does not fit into 16 bits, the linker
+# will generate a stub (containing a direct jump) and we end up
+# with the address of the
On 10/26/2016 04:46 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
+if { [istarget avr-*-*] } {
+ # If the value of a label does not fit into 16 bits, the linker
+ # will generate a stub (containing a direct jump) and we end up
+ # with the address of the stub instead of the address of the
12 matches
Mail list logo