Re: [patch] Poison SMALL_REGISTER_CLASSES

2012-02-16 Thread nick clifton
Hi Mike, Hi Steve, * config/rx/rx.h: Remove SMALL_REGISTER_CLASSES. I wasn't sure if these are obvious, because I already removed the definition from rx.h before, see ChangeLog-2010. Maybe someone put it back intentionally. Nick did it (intentionally) with: Sorry about that - sanfu

Re: [patch] Poison SMALL_REGISTER_CLASSES

2012-02-15 Thread Steven Bosscher
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote: Hello, While going through some old patches of mine, I noticed this: config/rl78/rl78.h:#define SMALL_REGISTER_CLASSES               1 config/rx/rx.h:#define SMALL_REGISTER_CLASSES           0 Can't possibly

Re: [patch] Poison SMALL_REGISTER_CLASSES

2012-02-15 Thread DJ Delorie
I would classify these as obvious but please make sure they go in before the poison patch ;-) And this will be needed to make those ports do what was intended: * config/rl78/rl78.h: Replace SMALL_REGISTER_CLASSES with hook. * config/rx/rx.h: Remove SMALL_REGISTER_CLASSES.

Re: [patch] Poison SMALL_REGISTER_CLASSES

2012-02-15 Thread Steven Bosscher
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 7:59 PM, DJ Delorie d...@redhat.com wrote: I would classify these as obvious but please make sure they go in before the poison patch ;-) And this will be needed to make those ports do what was intended:       * config/rl78/rl78.h: Replace SMALL_REGISTER_CLASSES with

Re: [patch] Poison SMALL_REGISTER_CLASSES

2012-02-15 Thread Mike Stump
On Feb 15, 2012, at 11:09 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote: On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 7:59 PM, DJ Delorie d...@redhat.com wrote: I would classify these as obvious but please make sure they go in before the poison patch ;-) And this will be needed to make those ports do what was intended: *