Richard Biener writes:
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 3:52 PM Richard Sandiford
>> This isn't a regression on a known testcase. However, it's a nasty
>> wrong code bug that could conceivably trigger for autovec code (although
>> I've not been able to construct a reproducer so far). That fix is also
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 3:52 PM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> aarch64-sve.md had a pattern that combined:
>
> cmpeq pb.T, pa/z, zc.T, #0
> mov zd.T, pb/z, #1
>
> into:
>
> cnotzd.T, pa/m, zc.T
>
> But this is only valid if pa.T is a ptrue. In other cases, the
>
