Re: FW: [PATCH] Cilk Keywords (_Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync) for C

2016-03-29 Thread Ilya Verbin
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 17:15:11 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 19:40:22 +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote: > > Do you plan to commit this patch? :) > > Well, I'm also still waiting for you guys to merge (via the upstream > Intel sources repository) my GNU Hurd

Re: FW: [PATCH] Cilk Keywords (_Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync) for C

2016-03-29 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 19:40:22 +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote: > Do you plan to commit this patch? :) Well, I'm also still waiting for you guys to merge (via the upstream Intel sources repository) my GNU Hurd portability patches; submitted to GCC in

Re: FW: [PATCH] Cilk Keywords (_Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync) for C

2016-03-28 Thread Ilya Verbin
Hi Thomas! Do you plan to commit this patch? :) On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 09:24:40 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On 09/29/14 08:26, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > >On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:58:31 +, "Tannenbaum, Barry M" > > wrote: > >>In a nutshell, add the following code to

RE: FW: [PATCH] Cilk Keywords (_Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync) for C

2014-09-29 Thread Thomas Schwinge
] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 9:56 AM To: Iyer, Balaji V Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: FW: [PATCH] Cilk Keywords (_Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync) for C Hi! On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 21:30:49 +, Iyer, Balaji V balaji.v.i...@intel.com wrote: --- /dev/null +++ gcc/testsuite/c-c

RE: FW: [PATCH] Cilk Keywords (_Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync) for C

2014-09-29 Thread Tannenbaum, Barry M
...@codesourcery.com] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 6:54 AM To: Tannenbaum, Barry M; Iyer, Balaji V; Zamyatin, Igor Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: RE: FW: [PATCH] Cilk Keywords (_Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync) for C Hi! On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 19:21:33 +, Tannenbaum, Barry M barry.m.tannenb

RE: FW: [PATCH] Cilk Keywords (_Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync) for C

2014-09-29 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:58:31 +, Tannenbaum, Barry M barry.m.tannenb...@intel.com wrote: In a nutshell, add the following code to main() before the call to f3(): int status = __cilkrts_set_param(nworkers, 2); if (0 != status) { // Failed to set the number of Cilk

RE: FW: [PATCH] Cilk Keywords (_Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync) for C

2014-09-29 Thread Tannenbaum, Barry M
...@codesourcery.com] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 10:27 AM To: Tannenbaum, Barry M; Iyer, Balaji V; Zamyatin, Igor Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: RE: FW: [PATCH] Cilk Keywords (_Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync) for C Hi! On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:58:31 +, Tannenbaum, Barry M barry.m.tannenb

Re: FW: [PATCH] Cilk Keywords (_Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync) for C

2014-09-29 Thread Jeff Law
On 09/29/14 08:26, Thomas Schwinge wrote: Hi! On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:58:31 +, Tannenbaum, Barry M barry.m.tannenb...@intel.com wrote: In a nutshell, add the following code to main() before the call to f3(): int status = __cilkrts_set_param(nworkers, 2); if (0 != status) {

Re: FW: [PATCH] Cilk Keywords (_Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync) for C

2014-09-22 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 21:30:49 +, Iyer, Balaji V balaji.v.i...@intel.com wrote: --- /dev/null +++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cilk-plus/CK/spawning_arg.c @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +/* { dg-do run { target { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* arm*-*-* } } } */ +/* { dg-options -fcilkplus } */ +/* {

RE: FW: [PATCH] Cilk Keywords (_Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync) for C

2014-09-22 Thread Tannenbaum, Barry M
@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: FW: [PATCH] Cilk Keywords (_Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync) for C Hi! On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 21:30:49 +, Iyer, Balaji V balaji.v.i...@intel.com wrote: --- /dev/null +++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cilk-plus/CK/spawning_arg.c @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +/* { dg-do run { target { i?86