On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 02:18:10PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> FAIL: c-c++-common/Wduplicated-branches-13.c -std=gnu++98 (test for excess
> errors)
> Excess errors:
> /daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20170127/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wduplicated-branches-13.c:11:7:
> warning: this decimal constant is
FAIL: c-c++-common/Wduplicated-branches-13.c -std=gnu++98 (test for excess
errors)
Excess errors:
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20170127/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wduplicated-branches-13.c:11:7:
warning: this decimal constant is unsigned only in ISO C90
David Edelsohn writes:
> I'm receiving the following error message for the new testcase:
>
> FAIL: c-c++-common/Wduplicated-branches-13.c -std=gnu++98 (test for
> excess errors)
> Excess errors:
>
I'm receiving the following error message for the new testcase:
FAIL: c-c++-common/Wduplicated-branches-13.c -std=gnu++98 (test for
excess errors)
Excess errors:
/nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wduplicated-branches-13.c:11:7:
warning: this decimal constant is unsigned only
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 01:17:03PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
>> > This testcase was breaking because we found ourselves in operand_equal_p
>>
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 01:17:03PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > This testcase was breaking because we found ourselves in operand_equal_p
> > with a COND_EXPR whose operand 2 was null -- i.e., missing else branch,
> >
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> This testcase was breaking because we found ourselves in operand_equal_p
> with a COND_EXPR whose operand 2 was null -- i.e., missing else branch,
> which won't happen for ? : but can happen here via
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:21:02PM +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
> This testcase was breaking because we found ourselves in operand_equal_p
> with a COND_EXPR whose operand 2 was null -- i.e., missing else branch,
> which won't happen for ? : but can happen here via -Wduplicated-branches.
>
>