On 16 May 2012 20:41, Tom Tromey tro...@redhat.com wrote:
Manuel * Hitting auto-completion in GDB means staring at the window for 5-10
Manuel minutes until it decides to stop listing stuff.
Report completion bugs to gdb. There's only so much gdb can do here.
But maybe we could have some
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
* announce_function dumps slow down Emacs (and the shell when working
via SSH) when debugging anything related to libstdc++ (or any large
testcase).
Let's make -quiet the default.
Agreed.
(I had always reflexively
On May 16, 2012, at 8:57 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez lopeziba...@gmail.com wrote:
I see now that any change in the underlying implementation becomes a
serious annoyance for you.
No, it is easy, we just need a low cost solution by which people can use the
normal accessors. Once that is provided,
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Basile Starynkevitch
bas...@starynkevitch.net wrote:
Hello All,
I am pinging the patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-02/msg00474.html
below for trunk svn 187587
# patch
Index: gcc/toplev.c
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 03:02:39PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Basile Starynkevitch
bas...@starynkevitch.net wrote:
Hello All,
I am pinging the patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-02/msg00474.html
below for trunk svn 187587
---
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Basile Starynkevitch
bas...@starynkevitch.net wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 03:02:39PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Basile Starynkevitch
bas...@starynkevitch.net wrote:
Hello All,
I am pinging the patch
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 03:29:12PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Basile Starynkevitch
bas...@starynkevitch.net wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 03:02:39PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Basile Starynkevitch
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Basile Starynkevitch
bas...@starynkevitch.net wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 03:29:12PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Basile Starynkevitch
bas...@starynkevitch.net wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 03:02:39PM +0200, Richard
On 16 May 2012 15:40, Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Without that patch displaying happen too late (and eats a lot of Emacs CPU)!!
1) Fix emacs (do not buffer stderr)
2) do not omit -quiet when running from inside emacs
Actually, I wonder how you (Richard) and other GCC
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
lopeziba...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 May 2012 15:40, Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Without that patch displaying happen too late (and eats a lot of Emacs
CPU)!!
1) Fix emacs (do not buffer stderr)
2) do not omit -quiet
Manuel == Manuel López-Ibáñez lopeziba...@gmail.com writes:
Manuel Actually, I wonder how you (Richard) and other GCC hackers work with
Manuel and debug GCC, because it is a real pain in the ass.
Manuel * All the TREE_ macros don't work.
Manuel * __extension__ prevents GDB from evaluating many
Manuel == Manuel López-Ibáñez lopeziba...@gmail.com writes:
Manuel It seems it will never work for statement expressions:
Manuel http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.devel/107339
It could be done, but it is non-trivial for sure.
Manuel I see how these small functions can quickly become
12 matches
Mail list logo
