Richard Sandiford wrote:
Thanks for the update.
Tejas Belagod tbela...@arm.com writes:
+/* Implementations of the iterator_group callbacks for ints. */
+
+/* Since GCC does not construct a table of valid constants,
+ we have to accept any int as valid. No cross-checking can
+ be done.
Tejas Belagod tbela...@arm.com writes:
New patch attached. OK?
+There are two standard integer attributes: @code{int}, the name of the
+code in lower case, and @code{INT}, the name of the code in upper case.
I don't think this is true. So the surrounding paragraph reduces to:
It is
On 2012-06-12 11:26, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Tejas Belagod tbela...@arm.com writes:
New patch attached. OK?
+There are two standard integer attributes: @code{int}, the name of the
+code in lower case, and @code{INT}, the name of the code in upper case.
I don't think this is true. So the
Richard Sandiford wrote:
As discussed in the context of the AARCH64 submission, this patch
rewrites the iterator handling in read-rtl.c so that we record
iterator positions using an on-the-side VEC rather than placeholder
modes and codes. We then substitute in-place for each sequence of
