Re: RFA: one more version of the patch for PR61360

2014-10-04 Thread Richard Sandiford
Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com writes: On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com wrote: I guess we achieved the consensus about the following patch to fix PR61360 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61360 The patch was successfully bootstrapped and

Re: RFA: one more version of the patch for PR61360

2014-10-04 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote: Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com writes: On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com wrote: I guess we achieved the consensus about the following patch to fix PR61360

Re: RFA: one more version of the patch for PR61360

2014-10-04 Thread Richard Sandiford
Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com writes: On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote: Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com writes: On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com wrote: I guess we achieved the consensus about the following

Re: RFA: one more version of the patch for PR61360

2014-10-03 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com wrote: I guess we achieved the consensus about the following patch to fix PR61360 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61360 The patch was successfully bootstrapped and tested (w/wo -march=amdfam10) on

Re: RFA: one more version of the patch for PR61360

2014-10-02 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
On 2014.09.26 at 16:31 -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote: I guess we achieved the consensus about the following patch to fix PR61360 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61360 The patch was successfully bootstrapped and tested (w/wo -march=amdfam10) on x86/x86-64. Is it ok to

Re: RFA: one more version of the patch for PR61360

2014-10-02 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
On 2014.10.02 at 09:17 +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: On 2014.09.26 at 16:31 -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote: I guess we achieved the consensus about the following patch to fix PR61360 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61360 The patch was successfully bootstrapped and

Re: RFA: one more version of the patch for PR61360

2014-10-02 Thread Vladimir Makarov
On 2014-10-02 7:31 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: On 2014.10.02 at 09:17 +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: On 2014.09.26 at 16:31 -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote: I guess we achieved the consensus about the following patch to fix PR61360 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61360 The

Re: RFA: one more version of the patch for PR61360

2014-09-28 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:31 PM, Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com wrote: I guess we achieved the consensus about the following patch to fix PR61360 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61360 The patch was successfully bootstrapped and tested (w/wo -march=amdfam10) on x86/x86-64.

Re: RFA: one more version of the patch for PR61360

2014-09-27 Thread Richard Sandiford
Hi Vlad, Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com writes: I guess we achieved the consensus about the following patch to fix PR61360 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61360 The patch was successfully bootstrapped and tested (w/wo -march=amdfam10) on x86/x86-64. Is it ok to commit