Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com wrote:
I guess we achieved the consensus about the following patch to fix
PR61360
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61360
The patch was successfully bootstrapped and
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com
wrote:
I guess we achieved the consensus about the following patch to fix
PR61360
Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Vladimir Makarov
vmaka...@redhat.com wrote:
I guess we achieved the consensus about the following
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com wrote:
I guess we achieved the consensus about the following patch to fix
PR61360
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61360
The patch was successfully bootstrapped and tested (w/wo
-march=amdfam10) on
On 2014.09.26 at 16:31 -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
I guess we achieved the consensus about the following patch to fix PR61360
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61360
The patch was successfully bootstrapped and tested (w/wo
-march=amdfam10) on x86/x86-64.
Is it ok to
On 2014.10.02 at 09:17 +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2014.09.26 at 16:31 -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
I guess we achieved the consensus about the following patch to fix PR61360
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61360
The patch was successfully bootstrapped and
On 2014-10-02 7:31 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2014.10.02 at 09:17 +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2014.09.26 at 16:31 -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
I guess we achieved the consensus about the following patch to fix PR61360
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61360
The
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:31 PM, Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com wrote:
I guess we achieved the consensus about the following patch to fix PR61360
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61360
The patch was successfully bootstrapped and tested (w/wo -march=amdfam10) on
x86/x86-64.
Hi Vlad,
Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com writes:
I guess we achieved the consensus about the following patch to fix PR61360
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61360
The patch was successfully bootstrapped and tested (w/wo
-march=amdfam10) on x86/x86-64.
Is it ok to commit