On 14 August 2012 15:44, Tom Tromey wrote:
Jonathan == Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com writes:
Jonathan I prefer it as unique_ptrdatum but I'm probably not your typical
Jonathan user of the pretty printers, so if anyone else has an opinion please
Jonathan share it.
I prefer it too.
Jonathan == Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com writes:
Jonathan I like it, please go ahead and check that in it you're happy
Jonathan with it.
I did. Thanks.
Tom
Jonathan == Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com writes:
$11 = std::unique_ptr containing (datum *) 0x6067d0
Jonathan It's inconsistent with the other printers in that it prints
Jonathan the stored type, unlike e.g. std::vectorint which just says
Jonathan std::vector of length ... but I think
On 13 August 2012 14:31, Tom Tromey wrote:
Jonathan == Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com writes:
$11 = std::unique_ptr containing (datum *) 0x6067d0
Jonathan It's inconsistent with the other printers in that it prints
Jonathan the stored type, unlike e.g. std::vectorint which just says
On 10 August 2012 20:49, Tom Tromey wrote:
A user reported on irc that the std::unique_ptr pretty-printer yields
bad results. For example:
(gdb) p uptr
$1 = std::tuple containing = {
[1] = ,
[2] = {
std::default_deletedatum = {No data fields}, No data fields}
}
This omits the
