On November 30, 2017 7:14:12 PM GMT+01:00, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>>
>> I have benchmarked this quite thoroughly while switching the defaults
>for Core
>> and Zen. Disabling alignment is pretty much consistent for
>specfp/int for
>> 2000,2006 and 2017 (last is Zen only) and quite consistent one. I
>
> I have benchmarked this quite thoroughly while switching the defaults for Core
> and Zen. Disabling alignment is pretty much consistent for specfp/int for
> 2000,2006 and 2017 (last is Zen only) and quite consistent one. I will
> analyze
> fma3d. It did not show with the alignment change al
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > Hi,
> > this patch makes costs in generic to math better modern chips (core,
> > haswell,
> > buldozer and zen). The only important change is to drop cost of unaligned
> > loads
> > and stores becuase all modern chips handle it well. T
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hi,
> this patch makes costs in generic to math better modern chips (core, haswell,
> buldozer and zen). The only important change is to drop cost of unaligned
> loads
> and stores becuase all modern chips handle it well. This makes vectori