Re: generic retuning part 1 - x86-tune-costs update

2017-11-30 Thread Richard Biener
On November 30, 2017 7:14:12 PM GMT+01:00, Jan Hubicka wrote: >> >> I have benchmarked this quite thoroughly while switching the defaults >for Core >> and Zen. Disabling alignment is pretty much consistent for >specfp/int for >> 2000,2006 and 2017 (last is Zen only) and quite consistent one. I

Re: generic retuning part 1 - x86-tune-costs update

2017-11-30 Thread Jan Hubicka
> > I have benchmarked this quite thoroughly while switching the defaults for Core > and Zen. Disabling alignment is pretty much consistent for specfp/int for > 2000,2006 and 2017 (last is Zen only) and quite consistent one. I will > analyze > fma3d. It did not show with the alignment change al

Re: generic retuning part 1 - x86-tune-costs update

2017-11-30 Thread Jan Hubicka
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote: > > Hi, > > this patch makes costs in generic to math better modern chips (core, > > haswell, > > buldozer and zen). The only important change is to drop cost of unaligned > > loads > > and stores becuase all modern chips handle it well. T

Re: generic retuning part 1 - x86-tune-costs update

2017-11-30 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote: > Hi, > this patch makes costs in generic to math better modern chips (core, haswell, > buldozer and zen). The only important change is to drop cost of unaligned > loads > and stores becuase all modern chips handle it well. This makes vectori