Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:58:41 + (UTC)
From: Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
It seems none in approval capacity have any objection to
(figuratively) s/target-libiberty//g in toplevel/configure.ac on
all branches. Is an
Ok for trunk?
Ok with me. I'll let the branch maintainers decide if they want it
for their branches.
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:16:48 +0200
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson h...@axis.com
PR47836
PR23656
PR47733
PR49247
* configure.ac (target_libraries): Remove target-libiberty.
...
JFTR, that's not proper PR annotation. I changed it as obvious
to the following,
On Wed, 18 May 2011, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Wed, 18 May 2011, DJ Delorie wrote:
At this point, though, I'm tempted to say there's no such thing as a
target libiberty and rip all the target-libiberty rules out, and let
Yes please. I've been arguing for that for some time.
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
It seems none in approval capacity have any objection to
(figuratively) s/target-libiberty//g in toplevel/configure.ac on
all branches. Is an --enable-target-libiberty or
--with-target-libiberty needed? (I'd just rather not.)
There should be
