On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
> You say that you have sent your copyright paperwork. Is the whole
> process finished? Only when the final paperwork is filed with the
> FSF can we start accepting significant changes.
I see that David Stone is listed with a note of "Assigns Past
and F
On 2012-08-22 20:56 , David Stone wrote:
I hope this can get looked at, thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-06/msg01208.html
Please send your patches as unified or context diffs (see
http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html).
You say that you have sent your copyright paperwork. Is the
I hope this can get looked at, thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-06/msg01208.html
Try CC:ing Gerald as the most likely maintainer to review this.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-06/msg01208.html
Some friendly users in the gcc irc chat informed me that I may be more likely to
get a review for my patch if it weren't a 100 KiB file. This is my attempt at
making the patch a little easier to read.
I'm not sure how important it is for documentation, but I have already sent in
my copyright assig
Second ping for patch that reorganized warning documentation
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg02024.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-06/msg00423.html
Ping for patch that reorganized warning documentation
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg02024.html
This is my first patch submission, so please let me know if I did anything
incorrectly.
This patch reorganizes the list of warnings available in GCC. I changed the top
of the page to be an overview of -Wall, then -Wextra, then -Wpedantic. After
that, individual warnings are listed with all of the
