Re: Another ping: Reorganized documentation for warnings -- attempt 2

2012-08-25 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Diego Novillo wrote: You say that you have sent your copyright paperwork. Is the whole process finished? Only when the final paperwork is filed with the FSF can we start accepting significant changes. I see that David Stone is listed with a note of Assigns Past and

Re: Another ping: Reorganized documentation for warnings -- attempt 2

2012-08-24 Thread Diego Novillo
On 2012-08-22 20:56 , David Stone wrote: I hope this can get looked at, thanks. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-06/msg01208.html Please send your patches as unified or context diffs (see http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html). You say that you have sent your copyright paperwork. Is

Another ping: Reorganized documentation for warnings -- attempt 2

2012-08-22 Thread David Stone
I hope this can get looked at, thanks. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-06/msg01208.html

Re: Ping: Reorganized documentation for warnings -- attempt 2

2012-06-29 Thread Joseph S. Myers
Try CC:ing Gerald as the most likely maintainer to review this. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com

Ping: Reorganized documentation for warnings -- attempt 2

2012-06-28 Thread David Stone
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-06/msg01208.html

Reorganized documentation for warnings -- attempt 2

2012-06-18 Thread David Stone
Some friendly users in the gcc irc chat informed me that I may be more likely to get a review for my patch if it weren't a 100 KiB file. This is my attempt at making the patch a little easier to read. I'm not sure how important it is for documentation, but I have already sent in my copyright