This avoids placing stmts beyond the vectorizer region begin which
confuses vect_stmt_dominates_stmt_p.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2020-07-13 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/96163
* tree-vect-slp.c (vect_schedule_slp_instance):
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013, Marc Glisse wrote:
* tree-flow-inline.h (get_addr_base_and_unit_offset_1): Handle
BIT_FIELD_REF.
I wrote a safer version of this for PR52436:
That variant is ok - please test and
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Richard Biener wrote:
So yes, handling BIT_FIELD_REF in the vectorizer looks like the correct
way to do - but mind that you should constrain the BIT_FIELD_REFs you
allow (I suppose in the end that's
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013, Marc Glisse wrote:
* tree-flow-inline.h (get_addr_base_and_unit_offset_1): Handle
BIT_FIELD_REF.
I wrote a safer version of this for PR52436:
case BIT_FIELD_REF:
- return NULL_TREE;
+ {
+ HOST_WIDE_INT this_off =
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Richard Biener wrote:
So yes, handling BIT_FIELD_REF in the vectorizer looks like the correct
way to do - but mind that you should constrain the BIT_FIELD_REFs you
allow (I suppose in the end that's properly done by other part of the analysis).
Does that mean adding
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
Hello,
this message is to check that I am not doing something absurd and ask for a
bit of advice.
In the attached patch, I let SLP recognize vector loads/stores just like it
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
Hello,
this message is to check that I am not doing something absurd and ask for a
bit of advice.
In the attached patch, I let SLP recognize vector loads/stores just like it
recognizes those in an array. It has a few
Hello,
this message is to check that I am not doing something absurd and ask for
a bit of advice.
In the attached patch, I let SLP recognize vector loads/stores just like
it recognizes those in an array. It has a few issues: the cost of the
vectorized version is overestimated, the base
