The 04/30/2020 12:26, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
> > > From: Gcc On Behalf Of Andrew Pinski via Gcc
> > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 6:25 AM Florian Weimer via Gcc
> > > wrote:
> > > > Distributions are receiving requests to build things with
> > > > -moutline-atomics:
> > > >
> > > >
On 5/1/20 11:48 AM, JiangNing OS via Gcc-patches wrote:
> In reality, a lot of users are still using old gcc versions running on new
> hardware. OpenJDK is a typical example, I think.
We can change the OpenJDK build scripts to use -moutline-atomics if
it's available. I agree with Richard that we
Hi all,
> -Original Message-
> From: Florian Weimer
> Sent: 04 May 2020 09:35
> To: Joseph Myers
> Cc: Kyrylo Tkachov ; Andrew Pinski
> ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nmeye...@amzn.com
> Subject: Re: Should ARMv8-A generic tuning default to -moutline-atomics
>
&g
* Joseph Myers:
> I think this change is what introduced a glibc testsuite regression in the
> localplt test.
>
> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-testresults/2020q2/006097.html
>
> Contents of elf/check-localplt.out:
>
> Extra PLT reference: libc.so: getauxval
>
> A reference to getauxval
I think this change is what introduced a glibc testsuite regression in the
localplt test.
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-testresults/2020q2/006097.html
Contents of elf/check-localplt.out:
Extra PLT reference: libc.so: getauxval
A reference to getauxval from libgcc is also a namespace
> > From: JiangNing OS
> > > Sent: 01 May 2020 11:49
> > > To: Richard Earnshaw ; Kyrylo Tkachov
> > > ; Andrew Pinski ; Florian
> > > Weimer
> > > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nmeye...@amzn.com
> > > Subject: RE: Should ARMv8-A generic
Kyrylo Tkachov
>> ; Andrew Pinski ; Florian
>> Weimer
>> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nmeye...@amzn.com
>> Subject: RE: Should ARMv8-A generic tuning default to -moutline-atomics
>>
>> In reality, a lot of users are still using old gcc versions running on new
>>
es@gcc.gnu.org; nmeye...@amzn.com
> Subject: RE: Should ARMv8-A generic tuning default to -moutline-atomics
>
> In reality, a lot of users are still using old gcc versions running on new
> hardware. OpenJDK is a typical example, I think.
Although this option is not an ABI change an
> Weimer
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nmeye...@amzn.com
> Subject: Re: Should ARMv8-A generic tuning default to -moutline-atomics
>
> On 01/05/2020 11:38, JiangNing OS via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > Hi Kyrill,
> >
> > Can it be backported to gcc 8/9/10 branches?
>
u.org; nmeye...@amzn.com
>> Subject: RE: Should ARMv8-A generic tuning default to -moutline-atomics
>>
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Gcc-patches On Behalf Of
>>> Kyrylo Tkachov
>>> Sent: 30 April 2020 11:57
>>> To: A
es@gcc.gnu.org; nmeye...@amzn.com
> Subject: RE: Should ARMv8-A generic tuning default to -moutline-atomics
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Gcc-patches On Behalf Of
> > Kyrylo Tkachov
> > Sent: 30 April 2020 11:57
> > To: Andrew Pinski ; Florian
> -Original Message-
> From: Gcc-patches On Behalf Of Kyrylo
> Tkachov
> Sent: 30 April 2020 11:57
> To: Andrew Pinski ; Florian Weimer
>
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nmeye...@amzn.com
> Subject: RE: Should ARMv8-A generic tuning default to -moutline-ato
On 30/04/2020 11:56, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
> [Moving to gcc-patches]
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Gcc On Behalf Of Andrew Pinski via Gcc
>> Sent: 30 April 2020 07:21
>> To: Florian Weimer
>> Cc: GCC Mailing List ; nmeye...@amzn.com
>>
[Moving to gcc-patches]
> -Original Message-
> From: Gcc On Behalf Of Andrew Pinski via Gcc
> Sent: 30 April 2020 07:21
> To: Florian Weimer
> Cc: GCC Mailing List ; nmeye...@amzn.com
> Subject: Re: Should ARMv8-A generic tuning default to -moutline-atomics
>
&
14 matches
Mail list logo
