Yep, looks good.
Jason
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > with multiple inheritance compiling the testcase bellow, the first call
> > > always
> > > leads to call with offseted pointer, while the other call results in if
> > > conditoinal testing if
> On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > with multiple inheritance compiling the testcase bellow, the first call
> > always
> > leads to call with offseted pointer, while the other call results in if
> > conditoinal testing if parameter is non-NULL.
> >
> > This patch teach VRP th
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hi,
> with multiple inheritance compiling the testcase bellow, the first call always
> leads to call with offseted pointer, while the other call results in if
> conditoinal testing if parameter is non-NULL.
>
> This patch teach VRP that THIS pointers and
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:12:49PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> @@ -1216,6 +1227,10 @@ gimple_stmt_nonzero_warnv_p (gimple stmt
> && DECL_IS_OPERATOR_NEW (fndecl)
> && !TREE_NOTHROW (fndecl))
> return true;
> + /* Referneces are alwyas non-NULL. */
Two typos.
I'll
Hi,
with multiple inheritance compiling the testcase bellow, the first call always
leads to call with offseted pointer, while the other call results in if
conditoinal testing if parameter is non-NULL.
This patch teach VRP that THIS pointers and references are non-zero. I hope
this is true also fo
