On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> The sequence of events here can be summarized as "shrink-wrapping causes
> the i386 backend to do something that confuses alias analysis". The
> miscompilation is that two instructions are swapped by the scheduler
> when they shouldn't be, du
The sequence of events here can be summarized as "shrink-wrapping causes
the i386 backend to do something that confuses alias analysis". The
miscompilation is that two instructions are swapped by the scheduler
when they shouldn't be, due to an incorrect reg_base_value.
The miscompiled function has
