My memories of why I did MeP the way I did are... vague. I recall it
had to do with getting the attributes to apply to C++ objects
correctly, since C++ objects tend to be "complicated" and gcc didn't
always pass me what I expected.
> think they are suppose to. They build, but I cant test them.
btw, a bit of followup...
There were a few other ports that had checks similar to that in their
handlers.. ie in rs6000.c:rs6000_handle_longcall_attribute() and
i386:ix86_handle_cconv_attribute()
if (TREE_CODE (*node) != FUNCTION_TYPE
&& TREE_CODE (*node) != FIELD_DECL
&& TREE_CO
While going through the attribute tables to sort out separation or trees
and types, I'm seeing a couple of ports with similar handlers that look
a little odd.
the code sequence in the handler looks like:
if (TREE_CODE (*node) != VAR_DECL
&& TREE_CODE (*node) != POINTER_TYPE
&& TREE
