Hi, I have committed the patch as revision 261039.
thanks. Qing > On May 29, 2018, at 7:08 PM, Qing Zhao <qing.z...@oracle.com> wrote: > > Hi, Jeff, > > Thanks a lot for your review and comments. > > I have updated my patch based on your suggestion, and retested this whole > patch on both X86 and aarch64. > > please take a look at the patch again. > > thanks. > > Qing > >> On May 25, 2018, at 3:38 PM, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> So I originally thought you had the core logic wrong in the immediate >> uses loop. But it's actually the case that the return value is the >> exact opposite of what I expected. >> >> ie, I expected "TRUE" to mean the call was transformed, "FALSE" if it >> was not transformed. >> >> Can you fix that so it's not so confusing? >> >> I think with that change we'll be good to go, but please repost for a >> final looksie. >> >> THanks, >> Jeff
