For cris-elf (no SIMD), the following tests regressed just as
for the similar tests mentioned in PR58556. These apparently
don't fail for the targets mentioned there for some reason, but
I see in the mail thread with the quoted subject there was no
conscious adjustment to the test-suite. Thus I
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
Yes, that will do. Can you do it for me? I can't do testing easily
on arm myself.
It also fails on x86_64 with -m32. I always test on x86_64 with
multilibs enabled:
make -k -j12 check
On 01/10/13 09:28, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
Yes, that will do. Can you do it for me? I can't do testing easily
on arm myself.
It also fails on x86_64 with -m32. I always test on x86_64 with
multilibs enabled:
make -k
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Kyrill Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com wrote:
On 01/10/13 09:28, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com
wrote:
Yes, that will do. Can you do it for me? I can't do testing easily
on arm myself.
It also
Hi Richard, David,
In principle yes. Note that it changes the behavior of -O2 -ftree-vectorize
as -ftree-vectorize does not imply changing the default cost model. I am
fine with that, but eventually this will have some testsuite fallout.
Indeed I am observing a regression with this patch on
Yes, that will do. Can you do it for me? I can't do testing easily
on arm myself.
thanks,
David
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 3:29 AM, Kyrill Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com wrote:
Hi Richard, David,
In principle yes. Note that it changes the behavior of -O2
-ftree-vectorize
as
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:10 AM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com
wrote:
I took the liberty to pick up Richard's original fvect-cost-model
patch and made some modification.
What has not changed:
1) option -ftree-vect-loop-version is removed;
2) three
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:10 AM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
I took the liberty to pick up Richard's original fvect-cost-model
patch and made some modification.
What has not changed:
1) option -ftree-vect-loop-version is removed;
2) three cost models are introduced: cheap
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:10 AM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
I took the liberty to pick up Richard's original fvect-cost-model
patch and made some modification.
What has not changed:
1) option
I took the liberty to pick up Richard's original fvect-cost-model
patch and made some modification.
What has not changed:
1) option -ftree-vect-loop-version is removed;
2) three cost models are introduced: cheap, dynamic, and unlimited;
3) unless explicitly specified, cheap model is the default
10 matches
Mail list logo
