From: Richard Biener
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 12:15:13 +0100
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:31 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> Maybe what we really mean to do here is check both op1 and SUBREG_REG
>> (op1) against SCALAR_INT_MODE_P instead of INTEGRAL_MODE_P?
>
> Yes.
Ok, I'll commit this after doing s
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:31 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Miller
> Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 00:33:05 -0500 (EST)
>
>> From: Richard Sandiford
>> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:14:53 +
>>
>>> ...given that the code is like you say written:
>>>
>>> if (SHIFT_COUNT_TRUNCATED)
>>> {
>>>
From: David Miller
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 00:33:05 -0500 (EST)
> From: Richard Sandiford
> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:14:53 +
>
>> ...given that the code is like you say written:
>>
>> if (SHIFT_COUNT_TRUNCATED)
>> {
>> if (CONST_INT_P (op1)
>> ...
>> else if (GET_
From: Richard Sandiford
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:14:53 +
> ...given that the code is like you say written:
>
> if (SHIFT_COUNT_TRUNCATED)
> {
> if (CONST_INT_P (op1)
> ...
> else if (GET_CODE (op1) == SUBREG
> && subreg_lowpart_p (op1)
> &
