On Fri, 23 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> On 21 January 2015 at 23:18, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> >> Thanks. I had wrongly made eliminate_constant_term() static, reverted
> >> that change and it builds on
> >> all targets in config-list.mk.
> >> Committed as r219655 (hopefully nothing breaks!
> Thanks, moved them to expmed.h.
> Boostrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu with languages: all, testing
> in progress.
> Build on all targets in config-list.mk in progress.
> Assuming it goes fine, OK to commit ?
You can install it under the obvious rule once successfully tested.
--
Eric Botcaz
On 21 January 2015 at 23:18, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> Thanks. I had wrongly made eliminate_constant_term() static, reverted
>> that change and it builds on
>> all targets in config-list.mk.
>> Committed as r219655 (hopefully nothing breaks!).
>
> Any particular reason why store_bit_field, extract_b
> Thanks. I had wrongly made eliminate_constant_term() static, reverted
> that change and it builds on
> all targets in config-list.mk.
> Committed as r219655 (hopefully nothing breaks!).
Any particular reason why store_bit_field, extract_bit_field, extract_low_bits
expand_mult and expand_mult_hi
On 14 January 2015 at 12:14, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
>> On 14 January 2015 at 17:31, Richard Biener wrote:
>> > On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 14 January 2015 at 11:16, Prathamesh Kulkarni
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > On 14
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> On 14 January 2015 at 17:31, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >
> >> On 14 January 2015 at 11:16, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> >> wrote:
> >> > On 14 January 2015 at 16:40, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> >> > wrote:
>
On 14 January 2015 at 17:31, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
>> On 14 January 2015 at 11:16, Prathamesh Kulkarni
>> wrote:
>> > On 14 January 2015 at 16:40, Prathamesh Kulkarni
>> > wrote:
>> >> On 14 January 2015 at 14:34, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >>>
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> On 14 January 2015 at 11:16, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> > On 14 January 2015 at 16:40, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > wrote:
> >> On 14 January 2015 at 14:34, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >>>
>
On 14 January 2015 at 16:40, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> On 14 January 2015 at 14:34, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>>
>>> On 13 January 2015 at 22:02, Prathamesh Kulkarni
>>> wrote:
>>> > On 13 January 2015 at 16:06, Prathamesh Kulkarni
>>> > wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> On 13 January 2015 at 22:02, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> > On 13 January 2015 at 16:06, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > wrote:
> >> On 13 January 2015 at 15:34, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 11 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >>>
>
On 13 January 2015 at 22:02, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> On 13 January 2015 at 16:06, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
>> On 13 January 2015 at 15:34, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Sun, 11 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>>>
Hi,
This is a revamped expr.h flattening flattening patch re
On 13 January 2015 at 16:06, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> On 13 January 2015 at 15:34, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Sun, 11 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> This is a revamped expr.h flattening flattening patch rebased on
>>> tree.h and tree-core.h flattening patch (r219402).
>>
On 13 January 2015 at 15:34, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> This is a revamped expr.h flattening flattening patch rebased on
>> tree.h and tree-core.h flattening patch (r219402).
>> It depends upon the following patch to get committed.
>> https:
On Sun, 11 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi,
> This is a revamped expr.h flattening flattening patch rebased on
> tree.h and tree-core.h flattening patch (r219402).
> It depends upon the following patch to get committed.
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg00565.html
>
> Chan
Hi,
I had a discussion with Michael, and would like to put this patch on
hold for now till we have tree.h and rtl.h flattening
patches checked in to avoid conflicts.
Thankyou,
Prathamesh
On 16 December 2014 at 17:13, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> Hi,
> The attached patch flattens expr.h.
> Move
15 matches
Mail list logo