Hi!
On 2023-04-14T13:49:20+0100, Gaius Mulley via Gcc-patches
wrote:
> Thomas Schwinge writes:
>> Separately, given that plain 'autoreconf' works, why have 'autogen.sh' at
>> all?
>
> If autoreconf does the same as autogen.sh then yes this can be removed
Pushed to master branch commit bd6dbdb1
t; This means that 'autogen.sh' vs. plain 'autoreconf' don't produce
> identical results: different order of files found via search paths.
> OK to align (and simplify) that as per the attached
> "libgm2: Adjust 'autogen.sh' to 'ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS
und via search paths.
OK to align (and simplify) that as per the attached
"libgm2: Adjust 'autogen.sh' to 'ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS', and simplify"?
Separately, given that plain 'autoreconf' works, why have 'autogen.sh' at
all?
Grüße
Thomas