Thanks very much Paolo.
I'll apply this patch on my side for a while.
I ll tell you if i see anything strange.
Regards,
Laurent
On 04/19/12 17:52, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 04/19/2012 05:02 PM, Laurent Alfonsi wrote:
Well, I don't know mt_allocator enough to know if this is a fix for
real or a
All,
The enclosed testcases (very close to
ext/mt_allocator/deallocate_global_thread-1.cc) exposes a pattern where
the following sequence is called (when __gthread_active_p is enabled) :
__gthread_key_create(key,::_M_destroy_thread_key);
__gthread_setspecific(key, (void*)_M_id);
Hi,
All,
The enclosed testcases (very close to
ext/mt_allocator/deallocate_global_thread-1.cc) exposes a pattern
where the following sequence is called (when __gthread_active_p is
enabled) :
__gthread_key_create(key,::_M_destroy_thread_key);
__gthread_setspecific(key,
Well, I don't know mt_allocator enough to know if this is a fix for real
or a quick fix.
Regards,
Laurent
On 04/19/12 16:26, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
All,
The enclosed testcases (very close to
ext/mt_allocator/deallocate_global_thread-1.cc) exposes a pattern
where the following sequence
On 04/19/2012 05:02 PM, Laurent Alfonsi wrote:
Well, I don't know mt_allocator enough to know if this is a fix for
real or a quick fix.
I'm pretty sure we could do better. Whether in practice we are going to
do better, any time soon, it's another matter ;)
Paolo.
