Re: libstdc++ new deque failures

2014-11-11 Thread FX
The patch below break bootstrap on darwin (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63811): Fix std::deque move construction with non-equal allocators. * include/bits/stl_deque.h (_Deque_base::_Deque_base(_Deque_base)): Dispatch according to whether allocators are always

Re: libstdc++ new deque failures

2014-11-11 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 11/11/14 10:49 +0100, FX wrote: The patch below break bootstrap on darwin (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63811): Fix std::deque move construction with non-equal allocators. * include/bits/stl_deque.h (_Deque_base::_Deque_base(_Deque_base)): Dispatch

Re: libstdc++ new deque failures

2014-11-10 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 05/11/14 17:49 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 5 November 2014 14:14, David Edelsohn wrote: Jonathan, I still am seeing new failures in the libstdc++ deque testsuite as of last night. I don't know if you still are working through the fallout from the earlier patches, but I wanted to make

libstdc++ new deque failures

2014-11-05 Thread David Edelsohn
Jonathan, I still am seeing new failures in the libstdc++ deque testsuite as of last night. I don't know if you still are working through the fallout from the earlier patches, but I wanted to make you aware. AIX defaults to 32 bit. A template was not initialized for int? FAIL:

Re: libstdc++ new deque failures

2014-11-05 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 5 November 2014 14:14, David Edelsohn wrote: Jonathan, I still am seeing new failures in the libstdc++ deque testsuite as of last night. I don't know if you still are working through the fallout from the earlier patches, but I wanted to make you aware. Yes, those tests are meant to fail