> "Paolo" == Paolo Bonzini writes:
I saw this thread due to Joseph's recent post about top-level configury
changes...
Paolo> * May in principle be in use (or be put to some use for libelf):
Paolo> fastjar libelf
I think fastjar is dead.
Paolo> * Probably present only for historical reasons
> dejagnu and expect used to have copies in the src tree but they were
> removed a long time ago, so I think of the rules for them both as a
> legacy (and I think those two go together).
Our tree has dejagnu in it; it's an excellent way to store baseboards
for ports we're working on or supporting
On 03/25/2011 11:59 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
* Maybe turn it into a build tool, and it may even make sense:
dejagnu
dejagnu and expect used to have copies in the src tree but they were
removed a long time ago, so I think of the rules for them both as a
legacy (and I think those two go togethe
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > My question is really whether people are using *any* of the following
> > in-tree (in a way that wouldn't better be served by either some other
> > package management system, or by their maintaining a local fork of the GCC
> > or src tree): bison byacc
On 03/24/2011 08:43 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
One thing I wonder is if we can
kill the toplevel support for building lots of miscellaneous tools that
aren't in the gcc or src trees and that aren't libraries used by tools in
those trees (such as the sup
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > One thing I wonder is if we can
> > kill the toplevel support for building lots of miscellaneous tools that
> > aren't in the gcc or src trees and that aren't libraries used by tools in
> > those trees (such as the support for dropping a GMP source tre
On 03/24/2011 06:43 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Is this actually desired? And what's all-utils? Can we just kill mt-mep?
utils at least exists in the src tree.
Indeed I didn't know about it. :) However it's not necessary to add it
specially nowad
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Is this actually desired? And what's all-utils? Can we just kill mt-mep?
utils at least exists in the src tree. One thing I wonder is if we can
kill the toplevel support for building lots of miscellaneous tools that
aren't in the gcc or src trees a
There's a top-level utils/ subdir in some trees. Yes, MeP has a tool
there.
Is this actually desired? And what's all-utils? Can we just kill mt-mep?
Thanks! :)
Paolo
10 matches
Mail list logo
