Re: *ping* Re: patch fortran, pr 59746, internal compiler error : segmentation fault

Hi Mikael, This is OK for trunk. Thanks for resurrecting the patch. Cheers Paul On 6 August 2015 at 12:11, Mikael Morin mikael.mo...@sfr.fr wrote: Le 29/07/2015 20:35, Mikael Morin a écrit : Hello, I'm unburrying the patch from the thread starting at:

*ping* Re: patch fortran, pr 59746, internal compiler error : segmentation fault

Le 29/07/2015 20:35, Mikael Morin a écrit : Hello, I'm unburrying the patch from the thread starting at: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg00439.html I provide the patch in two flavors read-only (without whitespace changes) and write-only (with them). This has been tested on

Re: patch fortran, pr 59746, internal compiler error : segmentation fault

Hello, I'm unburrying the patch from the thread starting at: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg00439.html I provide the patch in two flavors read-only (without whitespace changes) and write-only (with them). This has been tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk? Mikael

Re: patch fortran, pr 59746, internal compiler error : segmentation fault

Given that we are now in stage 1: Mikael and Bud, what's the status of this patch? http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2014-03/msg00098.html Tobias On January 13, 2014 22:18, Mikael Morin wrote: Hello, Le 10/03/2014 03:15, jimmie.da...@l-3com.com a écrit : Index: gcc/gcc/fortran/symbol.c

Re: patch fortran, pr 59746, internal compiler error : segmentation fault

Hello, Le 10/03/2014 03:15, jimmie.da...@l-3com.com a écrit : Index: gcc/gcc/fortran/symbol.c === --- gcc/gcc/fortran/symbol.c (revision 208437) +++ gcc/gcc/fortran/symbol.c (working copy) @@ -3069,56 +3069,56 @@

patch fortran, pr 59746, internal compiler error : segmentation fault

The code would only remove a variable from a common block if it was just defined in the previous statement. The PR showed a case where a pre-existing variable was put in the common block. When it was not removed, the common block list was wrong and segfaulted (or infinite looped) when used

Re: patch fortran, pr 59746, internal compiler error : segmentation fault

Hello, Le 09/03/2014 13:59, jimmie.da...@l-3com.com a écrit : The code would only remove a variable from a common block if it was just defined in the previous statement. The PR showed a case where a pre-existing variable was put in the common block. When it was not removed, the common

RE: patch fortran, pr 59746, internal compiler error : segmentation fault

Comments from Mikael: #1. Please merge the two ifs; it seems they have exactly the same scope after the patch. #2. This comment applies to the TOUPPER thing below... .. so it should be put here. Also the indentation is wrong. #3.This is unnecessary. === All

Re: patch fortran, pr 59746, internal compiler error : segmentation fault

Le 09/03/2014 20:47, jimmie.da...@l-3com.com a écrit : Comments from Mikael: #1. Please merge the two ifs; it seems they have exactly the same scope after the patch. #2. This comment applies to the TOUPPER thing below... .. so it should be put here. Also the indentation is wrong.

RE: patch fortran, pr 59746, internal compiler error : segmentation fault

From: Mikael Morin [mikael.mo...@sfr.fr] Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2014 3:40 PM To: Davis, Bud @ SSG - Link; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; fort...@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: patch fortran, pr 59746, internal compiler error : segmentation fault - if (p