On 01/29/2014 09:18 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 29 January 2014 20:06, François Dumont frs.dum...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is the patch that simply consider 55083 as not supported except in
normal mode. This is a temporary workaround for 4.9 release so I prefer not
to introduce a
On 29 January 2014 20:06, François Dumont frs.dum...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is the patch that simply consider 55083 as not supported except in
normal mode. This is a temporary workaround for 4.9 release so I prefer not
to introduce a dg-profile-mode-unsupported or something like that. Those
Indeed, default constructor and copy constructor shall not be noexcept
qualified.
IMO we should be able to make move constructor noexcept by using a
special allocator for the underlying unordered_map that would allow to
replace an entry with an other one without requiring a
Hi
This is a patch to fix PR 55033 in profile mode. Like in debug mode
it was missing noexcept qualifier on move constructor.
2014-01-26 François Dumont fdum...@gcc.gnu.org
PR libstdc++/55083
* include/profile/unordered_base.h (_Unordered_profile()): Add
noexcept qualifier.
On 26 January 2014 09:43, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
This is a patch to fix PR 55033 in profile mode. Like in debug mode it
was missing noexcept qualifier on move constructor.
But don't those functions allocate memory? So they can throw.
I agree we want the move constructor to be noexcept
Hi
Here is a patch to fix profile mode compilation errors. It makes
tree based containers C++11 allocator aware in profile mode as they are
in normal mode. I also try to use default implementation as much as
possible to benefit from the normal mode noexcept qualifications on the
On 15 January 2014 16:59, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
Here is a patch to fix profile mode compilation errors. It makes tree
based containers C++11 allocator aware in profile mode as they are in normal
mode. I also try to use default implementation as much as possible to
benefit from the
