On 04/10/14 22:54 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
On 23/09/2014 13:27, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Yes, OK for trunk - thanks very much.
Hi
There was in fact one last test failing, ext/profile/mh.cc, a
profile mode specific test. It must have been failing for quite a
while since malloc hooks h
On 23/09/2014 13:27, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Yes, OK for trunk - thanks very much.
Hi
There was in fact one last test failing, ext/profile/mh.cc, a
profile mode specific test. It must have been failing for quite a while
since malloc hooks has been deprecated. It is normally testing the
On 23 September 2014 22:19, François Dumont wrote:
> On 23/09/2014 13:27, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>> On 21/09/14 23:29 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
>>>
>>>With all those modifications I have been able to run all testsuite in
>>> profile mode with success.
>>
>>
>> I've looked over the patch
On 23/09/2014 13:27, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 21/09/14 23:29 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
With all those modifications I have been able to run all testsuite
in profile mode with success.
I've looked over the patch and it looks fine.
I don't know the details of the Profile Mode, so if you
On 21/09/14 23:29 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
With all those modifications I have been able to run all testsuite
in profile mode with success.
I've looked over the patch and it looks fine.
I don't know the details of the Profile Mode, so if you're happy that
these changes are an improveme
Hi
Here is the promise major patch for the profile mode. Here are the
most important modifications.
Now instance of profiling structs are kept as pointers in the
containers themselves. It has an impact on the container ABI but it
greatly enhance performances as we do not need to move
Hi,
On 05/24/2014 11:39 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 24 May 2014 22:10, François Dumont wrote:
Done but I forgot to fix the spelling. I will fix it in the future patch.
No problem, it's clear what the comment means.
I'm committing the below.
Paolo.
/
2014-05-25 Paolo C
On 24 May 2014 22:10, François Dumont wrote:
> Done but I forgot to fix the spelling. I will fix it in the future patch.
No problem, it's clear what the comment means.
On 24/05/2014 13:33, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 12/05/14 22:14 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
Here is a maintenance patch for profile mode. It does:
- Use inheritance to limit duplication of code in constructors to
register for the different profiling mode diagnostics data structure.
- Re
On 12/05/14 22:14 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
Here is a maintenance patch for profile mode. It does:
- Use inheritance to limit duplication of code in constructors to
register for the different profiling mode diagnostics data structure.
- Remove many code keeping only instrumented meth
On 12/05/2014 22:42, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 05/12/2014 10:14 PM, François Dumont wrote:
Regarding Makefile.in I miss last time. I moved to a new system
lately, a Ubuntu based one, and still need to find out what version
of automake/autoreconf I need to install. For the moment I have
upda
Hi,
On 05/12/2014 10:14 PM, François Dumont wrote:
Regarding Makefile.in I miss last time. I moved to a new system
lately, a Ubuntu based one, and still need to find out what version of
automake/autoreconf I need to install. For the moment I have updated
Makefile.in manually.
Isn't this clear
12 matches
Mail list logo
