On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 07/17/2015 01:57 PM, Abe wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Relative to the previous submission of this same patch, the below
>> corrects some minor spacing and/or indentation issues,
>> misc. other formatting fixes, and makes the disabled vectorizati
On 07/17/2015 01:57 PM, Abe wrote:
Dear all,
Relative to the previous submission of this same patch, the below
corrects some minor spacing and/or indentation issues,
misc. other formatting fixes, and makes the disabled vectorization tests
be disabled via "xfail" rather than by adding spaces to
d
[Alan wrote:]
> Would having a testsuite predicate for the target supporting gathered loads
> let you run this test on those architectures? I'd expect one to be useful
> in a few other places too, in time if it doesn't exist already...
Thanks, but I don`t think that would fully fix all the regres
Abe wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/if-cvt-stores-vect-ifcvt-18.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/if-cvt-stores-vect-ifcvt-18.c
index 71f2db3..2b159d7 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/if-cvt-stores-vect-ifcvt-18.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/if-cvt-stores-vect-ifcvt-18.c
@@
Dear all,
Relative to the previous submission of this same patch, the below corrects some
minor spacing and/or indentation issues,
misc. other formatting fixes, and makes the disabled vectorization tests be disabled via
"xfail" rather than by adding spaces to
deliberately cause the relevant sca
