On Thu, 2021-06-24 at 00:05 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 6/22/2021 3:44 AM, Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > [Resend because the original subject missed "[PATCH]" and the path
> > in
> > ChangeLog is wrong.]
> >
> > On MIPS a call to __stack_chk_fail needs an additional .reloc
> > pseudo-
On 6/22/2021 3:44 AM, Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-patches wrote:
[Resend because the original subject missed "[PATCH]" and the path in
ChangeLog is wrong.]
On MIPS a call to __stack_chk_fail needs an additional .reloc pseudo-op,
so "stack_chk_fail" will appear two times.
gcc/testsuite/
* g++.
[Resend because the original subject missed "[PATCH]" and the path in
ChangeLog is wrong.]
On MIPS a call to __stack_chk_fail needs an additional .reloc pseudo-op,
so "stack_chk_fail" will appear two times.
gcc/testsuite/
* g++.dg/no-stack-protector-attr-3.C (dg-final): Adjust for
On MIPS a call to __stack_chk_fail needs an additional .reloc pseudo-op,
so "stack_chk_fail" will appear two times.
gcc/testsuite/
* no-stack-protector-attr-3.C (dg-final): Adjust for MIPS.
---
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/no-stack-protector-attr-3.C | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 d
