2011/12/13 Miles Bader mi...@gnu.org:
Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com writes:
How about ...; suggest adding the using keyword?
That sounds like the compiler is suggesting that the user suggests
doing that!
It is similar to suggest parentheses
Good point, that's not correct
Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com writes:
On 11 December 2011 22:22, Fabien Chêne wrote:
Consequently, I propose to deprecate them with a warning, as clang already
does.
So that you get a warning for the following code:
struct A { int i; };
struct B : A
{
A::i; // - warning here
On 12 December 2011 09:18, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com writes:
On 11 December 2011 22:22, Fabien Chêne wrote:
Consequently, I propose to deprecate them with a warning, as clang already
does.
So that you get a warning for the following code:
struct A { int
Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com writes:
On 12 December 2011 09:18, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com writes:
On 11 December 2011 22:22, Fabien Chêne wrote:
Consequently, I propose to deprecate them with a warning, as clang already
does.
So that you get a
On 12 December 2011 10:08, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com writes:
On 12 December 2011 09:18, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com writes:
On 11 December 2011 22:22, Fabien Chêne wrote:
Consequently, I propose to deprecate them with a
Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com writes:
How about ...; suggest adding the using keyword?
That sounds like the compiler is suggesting that the user suggests
doing that!
It is similar to suggest parentheses
Good point, that's not correct English either, but it would be consistent.
Hi,
According to § 11.3/1 from c++98, access delarations are deprecated:
The access of a member of a base class can be changed in the derived
class by mentioning its qualified-id in the derived class declaration.
Such mention is called an access declaration. The effect of an access
declaration
On 11 December 2011 22:22, Fabien Chêne wrote:
Consequently, I propose to deprecate them with a warning, as clang already
does.
So that you get a warning for the following code:
struct A { int i; };
struct B : A
{
A::i; // - warning here
};
warning: access declarations are
2011/12/11 Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com:
On 11 December 2011 22:22, Fabien Chêne wrote:
Consequently, I propose to deprecate them with a warning, as clang already
does.
So that you get a warning for the following code:
struct A { int i; };
struct B : A
{
A::i; // - warning
