Re: wide-int, cfg

2014-04-25 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote: On Nov 25, 2013, at 2:57 AM, Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote: Richi has asked the we break the wide-int patch so that the

Re: wide-int, cfg

2014-04-24 Thread Mike Stump
On Nov 25, 2013, at 2:57 AM, Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote: Richi has asked the we break the wide-int patch so that the individual port and front end maintainers can review their parts without have to go

Re: wide-int, cfg

2013-11-25 Thread Richard Biener
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote: Richi has asked the we break the wide-int patch so that the individual port and front end maintainers can review their parts without have to go through the entire patch.This patch covers the cfg code. Ok? Hmm,

wide-int, cfg

2013-11-23 Thread Mike Stump
Richi has asked the we break the wide-int patch so that the individual port and front end maintainers can review their parts without have to go through the entire patch.This patch covers the cfg code. Ok? * cfgloop.c (alloc_loop): Initialize nb_iterations_upper_bound and