On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
On Nov 25, 2013, at 2:57 AM, Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
Richi has asked the we break the wide-int patch so that the
On Nov 25, 2013, at 2:57 AM, Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
Richi has asked the we break the wide-int patch so that the individual port
and front end maintainers can review their parts without have to go
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
Richi has asked the we break the wide-int patch so that the individual port
and front end maintainers can review their parts without have to go through
the entire patch.This patch covers the cfg code.
Ok?
Hmm,
Richi has asked the we break the wide-int patch so that the individual port and
front end maintainers can review their parts without have to go through the
entire patch.This patch covers the cfg code.
Ok?
* cfgloop.c
(alloc_loop): Initialize nb_iterations_upper_bound and