Ping?
Thanks!
-Zhenqiang
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Zhenqiang Chen
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 3:39 PM
To: 'Richard Henderson'
Cc: Richard Earnshaw; 'Richard Biener'; GCC Patches
Subject: RE:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:40:14AM +0400, Yury Gribov wrote:
Jakub already wrote the invoke.texi part:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg02061.html
Ah, thanks, I somehow missed it. When will this end up in trunk? I
have a depending patch.
When it is reviewed. I have various
Hi!
I've noticed we generate terrible code for the testcase below.
E.g. with -mavx2 it is:
leal6(%rdi), %edx
leal12(%rdi), %ecx
leal18(%rdi), %esi
leal3(%rdi), %eax
movl%edx, -20(%rsp)
movl%ecx, -24(%rsp)
leal
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
Here is a patch to add size relocation and instruction to obtain object's
size in i386 target.
+(define_insn move_size_reloc_mode
+ [(set (match_operand:SWI48 0 register_operand =r)
+(match_operand:MODE
On 18 November 2013 09:10, James Greenhalgh james.greenha...@arm.com wrote:
2013-11-18 James Greenhalgh james.greenha...@arm.com
* gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-builtins.c
(aarch64_simd_itype): Remove.
(aarch64_simd_builtin_datum): Remove itype, add
qualifiers
Hi!
One usage of ENTRY_BLOCK_PTR was missed:
g++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exceptions
-fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual
-Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros
-Wno-overlength-strings
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013, Cong Hou wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Cong Hou wrote:
I tried your method and it works well for doubles. But for float,
there is an issue. For the following gimple code:
c1 = a - b;
Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de writes:
2013-11-20 Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de
* config/mips/mips.c (r10k_simplify_address): Eliminate macro usage.
OK. And thanks for the catch.
Richard
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
2013-11-20 Jan-Benedict Glaw ...
* config/mips/mips.c (r10k_simplify_address): Eliminate macro usage.
diff --git a/gcc/config/mips/mips.c b/gcc/config/mips/mips.c
index 82ca719..d06d574 100644
--- a/gcc/config/mips/mips.c
Hi,
as Richard said, only a subset of rclass is allowed to be returned by
preferred_reload_class. I've tested the attached patched in Thumb
mode, on ARMv5, A9 and A9hf and on cross A15 without regression.
Yvan
2013-11-20 Yvan Roux yvan.r...@linaro.org
PR target/58785
*
On Wed, 20 Nov 2013, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
I've noticed we generate terrible code for the testcase below.
E.g. with -mavx2 it is:
leal6(%rdi), %edx
leal12(%rdi), %ecx
leal18(%rdi), %esi
leal3(%rdi), %eax
movl%edx, -20(%rsp)
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Ilya Tocar tocarip.in...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 Nov 11:27, Richard Biener wrote:
+ /* Set when symbol needs to be dumped for lto/offloading. */
+ unsigned need_dump : 1;
+
That's very non-descriptive. What's offloading? But yes, something
like this
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:34:30AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Ilya Tocar tocarip.in...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 Nov 11:27, Richard Biener wrote:
+ /* Set when symbol needs to be dumped for lto/offloading. */
+ unsigned need_dump : 1;
+
That's
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Kai Tietz kti...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello,
this is the second approach of the patch I've sent some months ago. I think
we saw that there was no other approach shown, so I will continue on that ...
The idea of this pass is to introduce a statement
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
check_function_arguments_recurse has an assert that is equivalent
to tree_fits_uhwi_p. The extraction can then use tree_to_uhwi.
Asserting here makes the intent obvious, but tree_to_uhwi also asserts
for
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:31:38AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
Aww ;) Nice improvement. Generally when I see this I always wonder
whether we want to do this kind of stuff pre RTL expansion.
1st to not rely on being able to TER, 2nd to finally eventually
get rid of TER.
These patches are
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
This is a case where tree_to_shwi can be used instead of TREE_INT_CST_LOW.
I separated it out because it was using a signed x * y / y == x to check
whether x * y overflows a HWI, which relies on undefined
+li Secify code[docs]/code in the subject header./li
Also [wwwdocs] instead of [docs].
--
Patrick Marlier
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
2013/11/19 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com:
On 11/19/13 05:20, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
2013/11/19 Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 Nov 12:33, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/19/13 05:13, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
On 19 Nov 13:00, Richard Biener wrote:
I'd say not in the gimplifier either but in varpool (symbol table) code
where the symbols are
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
2013/11/19 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com:
On 11/19/13 05:20, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
2013/11/19 Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Wed, 2013-11-20 10:08:45 +0100, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com
wrote:
[...]
I wonder if there are any more cases like this missed... Could you
please check that? Something like:
egrep -w ENTRY_BLOCK_PTR|EXIT_BLOCK_PTR gcc/*.[ch] gcc/config/*.[ch]
gcc/config/*/*.{c,h,md}
No more
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/18/13 14:03, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
2013/11/19 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com:
On 11/18/13 12:16, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
With current recursion elimination we will have:
test (int *param1)
{
bb1:
bb2:
_7 = PHIparam1(D)
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:30 AM, Zhenqiang Chen
zhenqiang.c...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
The issue files in PR 57683 include lra-constraints.o,
lra-eliminations.o and tree-switch-conversion.o.
Jeff had fixed them in trunk (r197467 and r198999):
On Wed, 20 Nov 2013, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:31:38AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
Aww ;) Nice improvement. Generally when I see this I always wonder
whether we want to do this kind of stuff pre RTL expansion.
1st to not rely on being able to TER, 2nd to finally
The following makes sure the languages default of -ffp-contract
is properly transfered to the LTO stage (which defaults to fast).
Merging different options from different TUs is done conservatively.
LTO bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2013-11-20 Richard
2013/11/20 Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/18/13 14:03, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
2013/11/19 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com:
On 11/18/13 12:16, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
With current recursion elimination we will have:
Hello Richard,
as a follow-up patch to the bit-fields patch(es), I wanted to remove the
dependencies on
the variable flag_strict_volatile_bitfields from expand_assignment and
expand_expr_real_1.
Additionally I want the access mode of the field to be selected in the memory
context,
instead of
2013/11/20 Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
2013/11/19 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com:
On 11/19/13 05:20, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
2013/11/19 Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 8:12
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
2013/11/20 Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/18/13 14:03, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
2013/11/19 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com:
On 11/18/13
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
2013/11/20 Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com
wrote:
2013/11/19 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com:
On 11/19/13 05:20, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
On 19/11/13 18:12, James Greenhalgh wrote:
There are no consumers for these attributes, nor should there
ever be. Remove them.
Regression tested on aarch64-none-elf with no issues.
OK?
Thanks,
James
---
2013-11-19 James Greenhalgh james.greenha...@arm.com
*
2013/11/20 Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com
wrote:
2013/11/20 Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com
wrote:
2013/11/19 Jeff Law
On 19 Nov 15:36, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Please also add new command options to g++.dg/other/sse-2.C and
g++.dg/other/sse-3.C
OK with the small nit below and with above testsute addition.
No need to document negative option here.
Thanks! I'll fix your inputs and check in after rest is
Thanks. Committed as rev 205023.
Nice work, but why did you antedate the entries in the various ChangeLog
files? That's rather confusing when you use them to track things in specific
directories (yes, we all know your opinion about ChangeLog files ;-)
--
Eric Botcazou
Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz writes:
* config/bootstrap-lto.mk: Use -ffat-lto-objects.
* common.opt (ffat-lto-objects): Disable by default.
* doc/invoke.texi (fat-lto-objects): Update documentation.
* opts.c: Enable fat-lto-objects on lto plugin disable setups.
This is
Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz writes:
* config/bootstrap-lto.mk: Use -ffat-lto-objects.
* common.opt (ffat-lto-objects): Disable by default.
* doc/invoke.texi (fat-lto-objects): Update documentation.
* opts.c: Enable fat-lto-objects on lto plugin disable setups.
This is
Hi,
actually the flag is being passed to the frontends instead of being consumed by
the driver that makes life easier. I am testing the attached patch and will
commit it as obvious if it passes (to unbreak the testing).
Index: opts.c
On 20 Nov 09:49, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
Here is a patch to add size relocation and instruction to obtain
object's size in i386 target.
+(define_insn move_size_reloc_mode
+ [(set (match_operand:SWI48 0
Thanks for comments, hope I got all of em.
Note: I used a LOOP_VINFO_LOC (loop_vinfo) to print the loop location
but it appears to be 0, so the output is somewhat lousy. The global
vect_location points somewhere inside the loop, which is not that better.
Shall we address this separately?
Sergos
Hi,
this is version I commited - we need to intrdocue var for -fuse-linker-plugin
to be able to check it.
I apologize for the breakage.
Honza
* opts.c (finish_options): Imply -ffat-lto-objects with
-fno-use-linker-plugin.
* common.opt (fuse-linker-plugin): Add var.
Index: opts.c
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
This patch applies the rule that functions defined in FOO.c must be
declared in FOO.h. One of the worst offenders in the code base is
tree.h, unsurprisingly.
The first patch contains the actual moves from tree.h into
This has been bugging me since I moved it out of gimple.h to gimplify.h.
The gimplify context structure was exposed in the header file to allow a
few other files to push and pop contexts off the gimplification stack.
Unfortunately, the struct contains a hash-table template, which means it
One simple switch to wi::add and one simplification that became possible
after Kenny's patch to remove the other real_from_integer.
Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu and applied as obvious (I hope).
Thanks,
Richard
Index: gcc/objc/objc-act.c
On 11/20/2013 08:35 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
Bootstraps on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu with no new regressions. OK for
mainline?
Andrew
And I've already fixed the typo in the changelog :-) I had it open in a
window but hadn't saved it when I created the patch.
Andrew
*
Il 20/11/2013 08:23, Markus Trippelsdorf ha scritto:
Hi,
now that slim-lto objects are enabled by default, it would be nice to
use them when building gcc with bootstrap-lto. The following patch
implements the handling of these objects in gcc's build machinery.
(Once -fuse-linker-plugin is
2013-11-20 Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com
PR c++/59173
* include/ext/pointer.h (pointer_traits::rebind): Add template
keyword in nested name.
Tested x86_64-linux, committed to trunk.
commit 7359ca380f9e4ec5d1193e1efcc3aec5af95ec93
Author: Jonathan Wakely
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 08:35:28AM -0500, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
I also hacked up the compiler to report what the 'top' of the stack
was for a compilation unit. I then ran it through a bootstrap and
full testsuite run of all languages, and looked for the maximum
number of context structs in use
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
Thanks. Committed as rev 205023.
Nice work, but why did you antedate the entries in the various ChangeLog
Oh, that's because of local commits and holding on to the patch for a
few days. That date is the date of the
On 20 Nov 10:59, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 Nov 12:33, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/19/13 05:13, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
On 19 Nov 13:00, Richard Biener wrote:
I'd say not in the gimplifier either but in varpool (symbol
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 8:32 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59212
Thanks. Fixed.
PR 59212
* g++.dg/plugin/selfassign.c: Include stringpool.h
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/plugin/selfassign.c
On 11/20/2013 08:44 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 08:35:28AM -0500, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
I also hacked up the compiler to report what the 'top' of the stack
was for a compilation unit. I then ran it through a bootstrap and
full testsuite run of all languages, and looked for
On 19/11/13 17:48, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/19/13 10:32, Steven Bosscher wrote:
Yes. In the GCC3 days it was important for sincos on i386, and on mk68
it used to be important for some of the funnier patterns. Not sure if
it's still useful today, though. Might be worth looking into, just to
I've committed a patch upstream to convert TREE_INT_CST_LOW to tree_to_[su]hwi
if there is an obvious tree_fits_[su]hwi_p guard. There were some other
changes from TREE_INT_CST_LOW to tree_to_[su]hwi that weren't as obvious
and I think we should deal with them separately. As before, these
On Wed, 20 Nov 2013, Sergey Ostanevich wrote:
Thanks for comments, hope I got all of em.
Note: I used a LOOP_VINFO_LOC (loop_vinfo) to print the loop location
but it appears to be 0, so the output is somewhat lousy. The global
vect_location points somewhere inside the loop, which is not that
This test changes from TREE_INT_CST_LOW to TREE_INT_CST_ELT. I was going
to change it back as part of the previous patch, but using wi:: seemed
more robust.
Only compile-tested so far because of problems with gcc110. OK for wide-int?
Richard
Index: gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
this is version I commited - we need to intrdocue var for -fuse-linker-plugin
to be able to check it.
I apologize for the breakage.
Honza
* opts.c (finish_options): Imply -ffat-lto-objects with
I would leave out the last frag of tree.c. It actually gets rid of what
i consider, a latent bug. it does not show up with the current
implementation of wide-int, but if that implementation changed, it
would. The problem is that you really should not expect that you can
set the min or max
looks fine to me.
kenny
On 11/20/2013 09:00 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
This test changes from TREE_INT_CST_LOW to TREE_INT_CST_ELT. I was going
to change it back as part of the previous patch, but using wi:: seemed
more robust.
Only compile-tested so far because of problems with gcc110.
Hi,
This is a reformatted patch after Ulrich review:
---
libgcc/ChangeLog:
2013-11-20 Adhemerval Zanella azane...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
* config/rs6000/ibm-ldouble.c (__gcc_qadd): Fix add
of normal number and qNaN to not raise an inexact exception.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Andrew MacLeod amacl...@redhat.com wrote:
This has been bugging me since I moved it out of gimple.h to gimplify.h.
The gimplify context structure was exposed in the header file to allow a few
other files to push and pop contexts off the gimplification stack.
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 02:59:21PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
--- a/gcc/c-family/c.opt
+++ b/gcc/c-family/c.opt
@@ -592,6 +592,10 @@ Wold-style-definition
C ObjC Var(warn_old_style_definition) Warning
Warn if an old-style parameter definition is used
+Wopenmp-simd
+C C++
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 03:12:34PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
The limit looks reasonable, but you could have used a simple linked
list (and never free). Also being able to pop a random context
looks fragile ... that is, pop_gimplify_context shouldn't have an argument.
Can't we use
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Basile Starynkevitch
bas...@starynkevitch.net wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 20:33 +0100, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
Thanks: Committed revision 205038.
This seems to break several g++ tests: see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-11/msg01482.html
On
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 03:12:34PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
The limit looks reasonable, but you could have used a simple linked
list (and never free). Also being able to pop a random context
looks fragile ... that is,
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
this is version I commited - we need to intrdocue var for
-fuse-linker-plugin
to be able to check it.
I apologize for the breakage.
Honza
* opts.c (finish_options): Imply -ffat-lto-objects with
On 11/20/2013 09:12 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Andrew MacLeod amacl...@redhat.com wrote:
This has been bugging me since I moved it out of gimple.h to gimplify.h.
The gimplify context structure was exposed in the header file to allow a few
other files to push and
On 06/11/13 06:10, Terry Guo wrote:
Hi,
This patch intends to minimize the use of literal pool for some armv7-m
targets that have slower speed to load data from flash than to fetch
instruction from flash. The normal literal load instruction is now replaced
by MOVW/MOVT instructions. A new
On 2013.11.20 at 14:41 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 20/11/2013 08:23, Markus Trippelsdorf ha scritto:
Hi,
now that slim-lto objects are enabled by default, it would be nice to
use them when building gcc with bootstrap-lto. The following patch
implements the handling of these objects
Updated as per Richard and Jakub feedback - assuming the default
for simd-cost-model is unlmited by default.
Richard - was you Ok with it?
Sergos
* common.opt: Added new option -fsimd-cost-model.
* tree-vectorizer.h (unlimited_cost_model): Interface update
to rely on
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 03:18:07PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 03:12:34PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
The limit looks reasonable, but you could have used a simple linked
list (and never free).
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 08:43:57AM -0500, Diego Novillo wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
Thanks. Committed as rev 205023.
Nice work, but why did you antedate the entries in the various ChangeLog
Oh, that's because of local commits and
Hi Joseph,
On 19 November 2013 21:53, Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 04:30:21PM +0530, Venkataramanan Kumar wrote:
This is RFC patch that adds machine descriptions to support stack
smashing protection in
David == David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com writes:
David I've committed the following to trunk as r205085, as a mixture of
David enabling work towards gdb being able to print vec, and to fix issues
David where the string-matching logic got confused by typedefs (done in a
David rather crude way,
Kenneth Zadeck zad...@naturalbridge.com writes:
I would leave out the last frag of tree.c. It actually gets rid of what
i consider, a latent bug. it does not show up with the current
implementation of wide-int, but if that implementation changed, it
would. The problem is that you really
FWIW this is the last change I had planned. I thought it would be easier
to do once the host_integerp replacement was in mainline, but that means
it's a bit closer to the deadline than it should have been.
The branch adds two new functions, cst_fits_uhwi_p and cst_fits_shwi_p,
alongside the
Hello,
Patch in the bottom fixes PR52731.
The essense of the problem is that `ia64_single_set'
allows double set as exception for `prologue_allocate_stack'
and `epilogue_deallocate_stack'.
Although it does not apply this exception for predicated
version of the patterns. I introduce explicit
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 08:43:57AM -0500, Diego Novillo wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
Thanks. Committed as rev 205023.
Nice work, but why did you antedate the
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/19/13 07:06, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
Here is a patch to add flag for marking symbols as requiring static
initialization of bounds. Used by Pointer Bounds Checker to handle
statically initialized pointers and static
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Andrew MacLeod amacl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/20/2013 09:12 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Andrew MacLeod amacl...@redhat.com
wrote:
This has been bugging me since I moved it out of gimple.h to gimplify.h.
The gimplify context
Embarrassing typos, my apologies. I was told to specify that I don't
have commit access, but since this mention is irrelevant, I modified my
suggested notice in about.html to reflect that. See attached.Index: projects/beginner.html
On 19/11/13 16:50, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 19/11/13 16:39, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
Committed.
/Marcus
2013-11-19 Marcus Shawcroft marcus.shawcr...@arm.com
* config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_save_or_restore_fprs): Fix over
length lines.
Minor nit... but ENOPATCH ;)
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 03:18:07PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 03:12:34PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
The limit looks
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
Here is a patch to add size relocation and instruction to obtain
object's size in i386 target.
+(define_insn move_size_reloc_mode
+ [(set (match_operand:SWI48 0 register_operand =r)
+
On 19/11/13 17:29, Alex Velenko wrote:
gcc/testsuite/
2013-11-19 Alex Velenko alex.vele...@arm.com
* gcc.target/aarch64/vneg_s.c (test_vneg_s8): fixed to not use
vector indexing.
(test_vneg_s16): Likewise.
(test_vneg_s32): Likewise.
2013/11/20 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
Here is a patch to add size relocation and instruction to obtain
object's size in i386 target.
+(define_insn move_size_reloc_mode
+ [(set (match_operand:SWI48 0
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Ulrich Weigand uweig...@de.ibm.com wrote:
Also note that this patch does not change how TDmode values are loaded
into GPRs: on little-endian, this means we do get the usual LE subreg
order there (least significant word in lowest-numbered register). This
does
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Adhemerval Zanella
azane...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
libgcc/ChangeLog:
2013-11-20 Adhemerval Zanella azane...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
* config/rs6000/ibm-ldouble.c (__gcc_qadd): Fix add
of normal number and qNaN to not raise an inexact
Hi all,
This patch will make the arm back-end use vcvt for float to fixed point
conversions when applicable.
Test on arm-none-linux-gnueabi has been done on the model.
Okay for trunk?
Kind regards,
Renlin Li
gcc/ChangeLog:
2013-11-20 Renlin Li renlin...@arm.com
*
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
2013/11/20 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com
wrote:
Here is a patch to add size relocation and instruction to obtain
object's size in i386
Hello!
Here is a patch introducing i386 target versions of Pointer Bounds Checker
builtins.
2013-11-15 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
* config/i386/i386-builtin-types.def (BND): New.
(ULONG): New.
(BND_FTYPE_PCVOID_ULONG): New.
(VOID_FTYPE_BND_PCVOID): New.
On 11/20/2013 10:51 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 03:18:07PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 03:12:34PM
2013/11/20 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
2013/11/20 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com
wrote:
Here is a patch to add size relocation and
David Edelsohn wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Ulrich Weigand uweig...@de.ibm.com wrote:
Also note that this patch does not change how TDmode values are loaded
into GPRs: on little-endian, this means we do get the usual LE subreg
order there (least significant word in
2013/11/20 Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com:
2013/11/20 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com
wrote:
2013/11/20 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com
wrote:
On 13/11/20 1:34 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Chung-Lin Tang clt...@codesourcery.com writes:
+;; Integer logical Operations
+
+(define_code_iterator LOGICAL [and ior xor])
+(define_code_attr logical_asm [(and and) (ior or) (xor xor)])
+
+(define_insn codesi3
+ [(set (match_operand:SI 0
On 11/20/2013 11:30 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 11/20/2013 10:51 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Trevor Saunders
tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 03:18:07PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Jakub Jelinek
On 11/20/13 06:44, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 08:35:28AM -0500, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
I also hacked up the compiler to report what the 'top' of the stack
was for a compilation unit. I then ran it through a bootstrap and
full testsuite run of all languages, and looked for the
On 11/20/13 06:56, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 11/20/2013 08:44 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 08:35:28AM -0500, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
I also hacked up the compiler to report what the 'top' of the stack
was for a compilation unit. I then ran it through a bootstrap and
full
This fixes an uninitialized variable introduced by the double_int rewrite.
Tested on SPARC/Solaris, applied on the mainline and 4.8 branch.
2013-11-20 Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com
PR target/59207
* config/sparc/sparc.c (sparc_fold_builtin) case CODE_FOR_pdist_vis:
1 - 100 of 193 matches
Mail list logo
