profile mode fix

Hi This is a patch to fix PR 55033 in profile mode. Like in debug mode it was missing noexcept qualifier on move constructor. 2014-01-26 François Dumont fdum...@gcc.gnu.org PR libstdc++/55083 * include/profile/unordered_base.h (_Unordered_profile()): Add noexcept qualifier.

Re: profile mode fix

On 26 January 2014 09:43, François Dumont wrote: Hi This is a patch to fix PR 55033 in profile mode. Like in debug mode it was missing noexcept qualifier on move constructor. But don't those functions allocate memory? So they can throw. I agree we want the move constructor to be noexcept

[patch] Adjust some libstdc++ tests

Also tweak a comment and whitespace. Tested x86_64-linux, committed to trunk. commit c0539972b28657267c3c0f91be0f0cf9ad1ab56f Author: Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com Date: Sun Jan 26 10:50:29 2014 + * include/bits/stl_map.h: Remove anachronistic comment. *

[patch] Fix typo in comment

Tested x86_64-linux, committed to trunk. commit 07c73153d6a224dfe2add152720e9d25369b33d3 Author: Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com Date: Sun Jan 26 10:51:17 2014 + * acinclude.m4 (GLIBCXX_ENABLE_C99): Fix typo. * configure: Regenerate. diff --git

Re: [Patch, i386] Separate Intel processor with expanded ISA

Updated patch with test. diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog index ccbea0f..e80c30b 100644 --- a/gcc/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2013-12-29 Allan Sandfeld Jensen sandf...@kde.org + * config/i386/i386.c (get_builtin_code_for_version): Separate + Westmere from Nehalem,

[PING] Re: Add const char* constructors for exception classes in stdexcept

Ping. The patch in question is here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-12/msg01688.html On Thu, 2013-12-19 at 16:28 +0100, Oleg Endo wrote: On Thu, 2013-12-19 at 01:19 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 19 December 2013 00:10, Oleg Endo wrote: Hello, When writing code such as

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR58007: unresolved fixup hell

Le 18/01/2014 21:17, Mikael Morin a écrit : Well, I guess that due to the touchy nature of the bug, there are cases that work by luck on old versions and fail (by unluck) on newer ones. Thus, I will backport in a few days to 4.8 and 4.7. I added the following hardening to the patch on the 4.8

[committed] hppa: Use indirect long call to non-local functions when generating 32-bit code

In the 32-bit runtime, it is more efficient to do a long call to a non- local function using an indirect call than it is to use the inline sequence currently in pa_output_call. The attached change modifies the call and call_value expanders to do this. Tested on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu,

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR58007: unresolved fixup hell

On Sun, 26 Jan 2014, Mikael Morin wrote: Le 18/01/2014 21:17, Mikael Morin a écrit : Well, I guess that due to the touchy nature of the bug, there are cases that work by luck on old versions and fail (by unluck) on newer ones. Thus, I will backport in a few days to 4.8 and 4.7. I added

Re: [RFC] [PATCH, AARCH64] : Using standard patterns for stack protection.

ping. On 22 January 2014 22:27, Venkataramanan Kumar venkataramanan.ku...@linaro.org wrote: Hi Marcus, After we changed the frame growing direction (downwards) in Aarch64, the back-end now generates stack smashing set and test based on generic code available in GCC. But most of the ports

Re: configure check for flex

On Sun, 8 Dec 2013, Bruce Korb wrote: On 12/08/13 13:06, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: Lovely. Thank you very much! (Looks like nobody replied to this and it isn't committed.) $ svn diff Index: configure.ac === --- configure.ac

RE: [PING] Another build!=host fix

Ping... Hello, and Ping for this patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-12/msg01552.html note however, that cross-building is probably broken anyway in the moment by r205690, Thanks Bernd. there is a small problem with SSIZE_MAX, because it is not always defined,