On November 10, 2014 9:45:27 PM CET, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi!
As the following two testcases shows, there are lots of issues in
ICF compare_gimple_call, in particular, it doesn't handle indirect
calls
properly (see the ipa-icf-31.c testcase), doesn't handle internal calls
Hi all,
here a second chunk which uses arm_eabi instead of arm*-*-*eabi* and
arm*-*-symbianelf*.
As I was told, arm*-*-symbianelf* should be EABI so we can use arm_eabi
for all instead of listing each OS.
Ok for trunk?
TIA,
Andreas
2014-11-10 Andreas Tobler andre...@gcc.gnu.org
On November 10, 2014 9:13:29 PM CET, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
std::swap was recently mentioned in gcc-patches@ mailing list, so I
gave it a try. As can be seen below, a lot of code in config/i386
benefits from this conversion.
Surprisingly, I didn't have to include any header
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On November 10, 2014 9:13:29 PM CET, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
std::swap was recently mentioned in gcc-patches@ mailing list, so I
gave it a try. As can be seen below, a lot of code in
Uros reported that my latest patch to fix PR63620 does not fix actually
the problem and H.J. reported that the patch resulted in 2 java test
failures (PR63799).
The following patch fixes PR63620 and PR63799.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63620
Ping. I'm getting more reports of this bug internally, and it would be
nice to have the fix upstream.
-cary
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Cary Coutant ccout...@google.com wrote:
Ping. Jason, do you still think the special-case for conversion ops is
inappropriate?
-cary
On Fri, Jul
On 10/11/14 21:50 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
Any news about this one ?
Here is another version with additional random tests on algos just to
challenge other combinations of tests.
PR libstdc++/61107
* include/bits/stl_algo.h (__inplace_stable_partition): Delete.
Tobias Grosser wrote:
On 10.11.2014 20:14, Roman Gareev wrote:
Sure. We should drop the flag in these test cases.
This seems to make sense, as they now test something different and
the flag removal would reflect this.
I personally would include this in the same patch. Would this be
On 09/11/14 16:00 -0800, Siva Chandra wrote:
Hello,
Attached is a patch which adds xmethods for the associative containers
(set, map, multiset and multimap) and their unordered versions. I
think the GDB Python API is not rich enough to implement xmethods for
the more interesting methods like
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
No extra includes required?
utility is already included in wide-int.h and rtl.h, should probably
move those.
--
Marc Glisse
On Nov 10, 2014, at 1:12 PM, Andreas Tobler andreast-l...@fgznet.ch wrote:
As I was told, arm*-*-symbianelf* should be EABI so we can use arm_eabi for
all instead of listing each OS.
Ok for trunk?
Ok.
Hi,
For the following test-case:
struct A {};
clang -fsyntax-only -Wc++-compat gives following warning and gcc does not:
empty-struct.c:1:1: warning: empty struct has size 0 in C, size 1 in
C++ [-Wc++-compat]
struct F {};
This patch adds the above warning to the C FE.
Bootstrapped on
[ sorry for dup, if any ]
On Nov 10, 2014, at 1:12 PM, Andreas Tobler andreast-l...@fgznet.ch wrote:
As I was told, arm*-*-symbianelf* should be EABI so we can use arm_eabi for
all instead of listing each OS.
Ok for trunk?
Ok.
Hi!
As the following two testcases shows, there are lots of issues in
ICF compare_gimple_call, in particular, it doesn't handle indirect calls
properly (see the ipa-icf-31.c testcase), doesn't handle internal calls
properly (see ubsan/ipa-icf-1.c), didn't check gimple_call flags at all.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 03:24:48AM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
* gcc/c/c-decl.c
(warn_cxx_compat_finish_struct): Add new parameter of type location_t.
Warn for empty struct.
(finish_struct): Pass loc to warn_cxx_compat_finish_struct.
* gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/Wcxx-compat-22.c:
Hi all,
another one. Here I'm not really sure if there are EABI variants which
do _not_ support these test cases.
My target succeeds with this patch.
Comments?
If no (comments), ok for trunk?
TIA,
Andreas
2014-11-10 Andreas Tobler andre...@gcc.gnu.org
*
Cesar Philippidis wrote:
This patch adds support for OpenACC 2.0a, with some omissions, to the
fortran front end. It only contains the fortran changes from
gomp-4_0-branch, therefore the middle end and runtime changes are a
necessary prerequisite for this patch.
I'd assume that one could
I introduced the random tests after Christopher Jefferson request
to have more intensive tests on those algos. Is it the whole stuff of
tests using random numbers that you don't like or just the usage of
mt19937 ? If second is this new version using the usual random_device I
used so far
On 10/11/14 23:14 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
I introduced the random tests after Christopher Jefferson request
to have more intensive tests on those algos. Is it the whole stuff of
tests using random numbers that you don't like or just the usage of
mt19937 ?
The use of random number in
On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 14:56 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 01:07:28PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
To be constructive here - the above case is from within a
GIMPLE_ASSIGN case label
and thus I'd have expected
case GIMPLE_ASSIGN:
{
gassign *a1
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 01:06:41PM +0100, Alan Lawrence wrote:
This migrates the reduction patterns in altivec.md and vector.md to
the new names. I've not touched paired.md as I wasn't really sure
how to fix that (how do I vec_extractv2sf ?), moreover the testing I
did didn't seem to exercise
No the random tests didn't show any problem. I had demonstrated the
problems with the modifications on the existing tests simulating
constraint memory context.
So unless specified otherwise I will commit tomorrow without the tests
using random numbers.
François
On 10/11/2014 23:20,
On 11/10/2014 02:08 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Cesar Philippidis wrote:
This patch adds support for OpenACC 2.0a, with some omissions, to the
fortran front end. It only contains the fortran changes from
gomp-4_0-branch, therefore the middle end and runtime changes are a
necessary prerequisite
On 10/11/14 23:39 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
No the random tests didn't show any problem. I had demonstrated the
problems with the modifications on the existing tests simulating
constraint memory context.
So unless specified otherwise I will commit tomorrow without the tests
using random
On 05/11/14 17:49 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 5 November 2014 14:14, David Edelsohn wrote:
Jonathan,
I still am seeing new failures in the libstdc++ deque testsuite as of
last night. I don't know if you still are working through the fallout
from the earlier patches, but I wanted to make
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:08:54PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
@@ -662,9 +662,49 @@ func_checker::compare_gimple_call (gimpl
t1 = gimple_call_fndecl (s1);
t2 = gimple_call_fndecl (s2);
Just drop these and compare gimple_call_fn only.
+ tree chain1 = gimple_call_chain (s1);
+
On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 08:31:43PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Attached (mechanical) patch adds i?86-*-* target to many tests, where
only x86_64-*-* is listed. Please note that x86_64-*-* already
included lp64 for 64bit specific tests due to -m32 multilib
testing.
2014-11-02 Uros Bizjak
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:35 AM, Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 03:24:48AM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
* gcc/c/c-decl.c
(warn_cxx_compat_finish_struct): Add new parameter of type location_t.
Warn for empty struct.
(finish_struct): Pass loc to
Ping.
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
Ping.
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
Ping.
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
Hi Richard,
I also ran the gcc testsuite
Hello!
Now that Vlad fixed the real problem of PR 63620 [1], we can remove
the temporary workaround. The patch also adds the testcase from PR.
2014-11-11 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
Revert:
2014-10-31 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
PR target/63620
*
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 2:27 PM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 14:56 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 01:07:28PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
To be constructive here - the above case is from within a
GIMPLE_ASSIGN case label
and thus I'd
On Nov 10, 2014, at 2:06 PM, Andreas Tobler andreast-l...@fgznet.ch wrote:
another one. Here I'm not really sure if there are EABI variants which do
_not_ support these test cases.
I think the patch is fine, just watch for any follow-on comments from an
eabi/arm expert. Usually they are
Backport pending upstream patch to fix demangler crash.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg02279.html
This patch is for the google/gcc-4_9 branch.
Google ref: 17891596
-cary
2014-05-27 Pedro Alves pal...@redhat.com
include/
* demangle.h (enum demangle_component_type)
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Cary Coutant ccout...@google.com wrote:
Backport pending upstream patch to fix demangler crash.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg02279.html
This patch is for the google/gcc-4_9 branch.
Google ref: 17891596
-cary
OK for Google branches.
Hi Jeff,
I have adapted the code generation part from James' patch to current trunk, and
the resulting patch gets the 30% speedup on coremark and passes bootstrap of
GCC.
Ok for trunk?
Thanks,
Sebastian
Sebastian Pop wrote:
Sebastian Pop wrote:
Jeff Law wrote:
On 08/21/14 04:30, Richard
On x86_64-apple-darwin14, the attached patch allows gcc trunk to
build against isl 0.14. I assume if we want to retain the...
#if defined(__cplusplus)
extern C {
#endif
#if defined(__cplusplus)
}
#endif
wrappers around the include of isl/val_gmp.h, to continue to support
isl 0.12.2, isl.m4
Hi,
This patch tweaks the VRP code to simply inspect the need_assert_for
bitmap when determining whether any asserts need to be inserted.
Consequently we no longer have to manually keep track of whether a call
to register_new_assert_for() was made.
This patch is an updated version of a patch
This patch refactors the VRP edge-assertion code to make it always
traverse SSA-name definitions in order to find suitable edge assertions
to insert. Currently SSA-name definitions get traversed only when the
LHS of the original conditional is a bitwise AND or OR operation which
seems like a
On 11/10/2014 12:10 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 11/10/2014 10:55 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
Would a 4.9 version be accepted?
Sure.
What do you think about defining the macros for unsupported features
to 0 rather than leaving them undefined? The document doesn't seem to
specify.
Jason
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 1:55 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 8:28 AM, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
do $subject, and cleanup for always 64 bit hwi.
bootstrapped + regtested
Cesar Philippidis wrote:
This patch contains compile-time tests for OpenACC in gfortran. Is this
patch OK for mainline trunk after the OpenACC fortran front end changes
make their way in?
I browsed the test cases – and they look okay. I didn't try hard to see
whether every single one is valid
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 05:30:38PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
On 06 Nov 19:25, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Oh, one more point, if mic_lib_path is NULL, what is the point
to do the alloca/malloc and string copying? Can't you just
setenv (MIC_LD_LIBRARY_PATH_ENV, ld_lib_path, 1);
in that case
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 05:34:30PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
Done, I put them into env vars.
+lappend ALWAYS_CFLAGS
additional_flags=${offload_additional_options}
}
Perhaps add this only if offload_additional_options is non-empty?
Done.
Ok (with appropriate ChangeLog
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 05:36:24PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote:
However, the double pattern is completely broken. This cannot go in.
[snip]
It is unacceptable to have to do the inner loop doing a load, vector add, and
store in the loop.
Before the patch, the final reduction used
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 02:43:38PM -0800, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
I'll post a separate patch with the fortran tests later. If anyone
wants to test this patch, please use gomp-4_0-branch instead. You
don't need a CUDA accelerator to use
OpenACC, and some of the runtime tests will fail
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 05:27:50PM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 14:56 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 01:07:28PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
To be constructive here - the above case is from within a
GIMPLE_ASSIGN case label
and thus I'd have
PING! I am worried if it goes in stage-1.
-Original Message-
From: Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 2:24 PM
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH, aarch64] Add prefetch support
Hi,
Below is the patch that implements prefetching support.
This patch has
Hi,
Dose anybody have time to review this? Thanks.
Hello,
Ping for https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg02933.html
Thanks
Hello!
do $subject, and cleanup for always 64 bit hwi.
bootstrapped + regtested x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, ok?
Ok. Can you please replace remaining HOST_WIDE_INT
vestiges in there with [u]int64_t please?
This patch breaks the build on debian 6.0:
../../gcc/sreal.c: In member function
We just remarked that there is a coverage inaccuracy in C/C++ for something as
simple as:
void
foo (int i)
{
if (i 1)
return;
bar ();
}
The return line is always reported as covered, even at -O0. That's because
the return is used as the representative return for the entire function
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2014-11-10 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
* match.pd: Move rest of the conversion combining patterns
from tree-ssa-forwprop.c.
* tree-ssa-forwprop.c (combine_conversions): Remove.
The patch looks great. The only piece I think we missed is the
fgraphite-code-generator flag. I would propose to remove it as well in this
commit, as it does not have any effect any more.
In this case, we’ll also have to change tests which use
fgraphite-code-generator flag
Hi,
There is parameter max-pending-list-length in gcc scheduler, but the
parameter is checked using greater than condition. As a result, the real
max pending list length is actually max-pending-list-length + 1. This
patch fixes this by using = rather than comparison operator. Though
it is kind
This fixes a few UNRESOLVEDs because I forgot to skip -fno-fat-lto-objects
when I introduced the tests.
Ok for trunk?
2014-11-10 Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com
* c-c++-common/ubsan/align-7.c: Skip for -flto -fno-fat-lto-objects.
* c-c++-common/ubsan/align-8.c: Likewise.
Am 2014-11-07 20:52, schrieb David Edelsohn:
First, please explicitly copy me on AIX or PowerPC patches sent to
gcc-patches.
I don't have a fundamental objection to including this option, but
note that Richi, Honza and I have discovered that using AIX runtime
linking option interacts
The following patch fixes a latent bug uncovered by stmt folding
that expansion of FMA_EXPR didn't consider the multiplication
commutative when looking for feeding negates.
Bootstrap regtest pending.
Richard.
2014-11-10 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
PR middle-end/63798
*
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:41:36AM +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
This fixes a few UNRESOLVEDs because I forgot to skip -fno-fat-lto-objects
when I introduced the tests.
Ok for trunk?
2014-11-10 Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com
* c-c++-common/ubsan/align-7.c: Skip for -flto
Hello.
In gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ldist-19.c, there's a pair of functions (one with 'char' and
second with 'unsigned char'). These two functions are merged by IPA ICF on
targets that where 'char' == 'unsigned char'. So that it would be easier to
disable the optimization.
Ready for trunk?
Thanks,
This merges the last conversion pattern from tree-ssa-forwprop.c.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2014-11-10 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
* match.pd: Implement pattern from simplify_conversion_from_bitmask.
* tree-ssa-forwprop.c
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 5:46 PM, H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com wrote:
Hi,
r216964 disables bootstrap for libcc1 which exposed 2 things:
1. libcc1 isn't compiled with LTO even when GCC is configured with
--with-build-config=bootstrap-lto. It may be intentional since
libcc1 is disabled for
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Jack Howarth howarth.at@gmail.com wrote:
Iain,
It doesn't look like it will be that simple. If I replace the
proposed patches with a change like...
Index: gcc/system.h
===
---
On 10.11.2014 10:03, Roman Gareev wrote:
The patch looks great. The only piece I think we missed is the
fgraphite-code-generator flag. I would propose to remove it as well in this
commit, as it does not have any effect any more.
In this case, we’ll also have to change tests which use
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Patrick Palka patr...@parcs.ath.cx
wrote:
PR 63748 reports a false-positive uninitialized warning under the
presence of abnormal edges. The statements for which the uninitialized
warnings are emitted all look like:
buf_117(ab) = buf_317(D)(ab);
This PR is
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Bin Cheng bin.ch...@arm.com wrote:
Hi,
There is parameter max-pending-list-length in gcc scheduler, but the
parameter is checked using greater than condition. As a result, the real
max pending list length is actually max-pending-list-length + 1. This
patch
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Martin Liška mli...@suse.cz wrote:
Hello.
In gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ldist-19.c, there's a pair of functions (one with 'char'
and second with 'unsigned char'). These two functions are merged by IPA ICF
on targets that where 'char' == 'unsigned char'. So that it would
Full bootstrap + regtesting on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu is in progress.
Is this patch OK if testing succeeds with no new regressions?
... ok. But please watch for fallout.
I'd do a bootstrap with Ada enabled, the Ada compiler is the only serious user
of abnormal edges in GIMPLE on Linux
On 10 November 2014 10:55, Richard Biener wrote:
The following patch fixes a latent bug uncovered by stmt folding
that expansion of FMA_EXPR didn't consider the multiplication
commutative when looking for feeding negates.
Bootstrap regtest pending.
Richard.
2014-11-10 Richard Biener
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 12:29 AM, Kugan
kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org wrote:
Well - the best way would be to expose the target specifics to GIMPLE
at some point in the optimization pipeline. My guess would be that it's
appropriate after loop optimizations (but maybe before induction
The following patch plugs a leak in SSA stmt operands. finalize_ssa_uses
always frees all old operands and then allocates new ones - but in
freeing the old operands it only inserts the first freed one into
the freelist. The following patch makes us use the same trick
as free_stmt_operands to
2014-11-10 14:53 GMT+03:00 Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Jack Howarth howarth.at@gmail.com wrote:
Iain,
It doesn't look like it will be that simple. If I replace the
proposed patches with a change like...
Index: gcc/system.h
On Oct 21, 2014, at 8:06 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov maxim.kuvyr...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
This patch adds auto-prefetcher modeling to GCC scheduler. The
auto-prefetcher model is currently enabled only for ARM Cortex-A15, since
this is the only CPU that I know of to have the hardware
*Ping*
2014-10-13 14:48 GMT+04:00 Varvara Rainchik varvara.s.rainc...@gmail.com:
Now, I wonder on which OS and why does config/tls.m4 CHECK_GCC_TLS
actually fail? Can you figure that out?
On Android check passes with --disable-tls (standard while building
gcc for Android as TLS is not
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 12:50:44PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 5:46 PM, H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com wrote:
Hi,
r216964 disables bootstrap for libcc1 which exposed 2 things:
1. libcc1 isn't
Hi,
This patch adds support for operator-lists to be used in expression.
I reuse operator-list as the iterator. This is not really valid since
user-defined operator-lists cannot be iterator in 'for', but it was
convenient to reuse operator-list as a 'for' iterator
and lower_for doesn't care
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 05:32:32AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 12:50:44PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 5:46 PM, H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com wrote:
Hi,
r216964 disables
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 05:32:32AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 12:50:44PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 5:46
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
Full bootstrap + regtesting on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu is in progress.
Is this patch OK if testing succeeds with no new regressions?
... ok. But please watch for fallout.
I'd do a bootstrap with Ada enabled, the
I'd still like to avoid the rampant duplication if possible. One
approach would be to put most of the test in something like
nilptr_tests.go marked with // skip. Then we can have top-level
nilptrXX.go tests with +build lines that use // run nilptr_tests.go.
I fail to see how that could be
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 02:44:55PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
I admit I haven't tried LTO bootstrap, but from normal bootstrap logs,
libcc1 is built normally using libtool using -fPIC only, and linked into
libcc1.so.0.0.0 and libcc1plugin.so.0.0.0, and of course against the
This fixes PR63800 which shows that PRE eliminate() avail handling
is too simplistic with the code to avoid vectorization regressions.
The following patch makes it properly restore old availability.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2014-11-10 Richard
On 06 Nov 19:25, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Oh, one more point, if mic_lib_path is NULL, what is the point
to do the alloca/malloc and string copying? Can't you just
setenv (MIC_LD_LIBRARY_PATH_ENV, ld_lib_path, 1);
in that case early?
Otherwise LGTM.
Done.
Thanks,
-- Ilya
---
diff
Hi Richard,
Ping for these FR-V patches:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg02645.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg02646.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg02647.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg02648.html
which convert callers of
On 06 Nov 18:55, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Looks mostly good, but:
+# We need more things in site.exp, but automake completely controls the
+# creation of that file; there's no way to append to it without messing up
+# the dependancy chains. So we overrule automake. This rule is exactly
+#
Indeed string is a system header and should not have been included from
tree-chkp.c but system.h
Indeed.
My knowledge of C++ is limited, but I think this additional patch to wide-int.h
is the proper fix to the issue reported by Jack, no?
I’m bootstrapping it right now, it already passed stage
My knowledge of C++ is limited, but I think this additional patch to
wide-int.h is the proper fix to the issue reported by Jack, no?
I’m bootstrapping it right now, it already passed stage 2.
Boostrapped succeeded on x86_64-apple-darwin14.
OK to commit to trunk?
string.diff
Description:
On 30 October 2014 23:02, Christophe Lyon christophe.l...@linaro.org wrote:
On 29 October 2014 16:28, Ramana Radhakrishnan
ramana@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Christophe Lyon
christophe.l...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
In PR61153, the vbic and vorn tests fail because
2014-11-10 Joel Sherrill joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com
* src/c++98/mt_allocator.cc: Fix assumption that sizeof(void *) is
equal to sizeof(size_t). The m32c breaks this assumption.
---
libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/mt_allocator.cc | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
supposedly because there are a few regressions.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2014-11-10 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
* tree-ssa-forwprop.c (simplify_conversion_from_bitmask): Remove.
(associate_plusminus): Likewise.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2014-11-10 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
* match.pd: Implement pattern from simplify_mult.
* tree-ssa-forwprop.c (simplify_mult): Remove.
(pass_forwprop::execute): Do not call simplify_mult.
Hi
in a patch I work on I store ipa_polymorphic_call_contexts in a vector
and thus they do not get properly constructed, merely memset to zero.
This means that I happen to be using know nothing contexts which
have their outer_type set to NULL but the various flags are also
false, unlike in
Hi,
Here is a fix for PR63766. Currently all functions are transformed into SSA
before local optimizations and it allows function to be inlined and removed
before it goes through local optimzations. But this requires removal of these
functions from working queue.
Bootstrapped and tested on
On 11/09/2014 11:45 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 11/09/2014 08:33 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
+ //cpp_hashnode *node = 0;
+ //node = token-val.node.node;
+ //if (node)
+ // pfile-mi_ind_cmacro = node;
Remove this commented-out code?
The patch is OK.
Jason
Here is the committed
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:59 AM, Michael Haubenwallner
michael.haubenwall...@ssi-schaefer.com wrote:
Am 2014-11-07 20:52, schrieb David Edelsohn:
First, please explicitly copy me on AIX or PowerPC patches sent to
gcc-patches.
I don't have a fundamental objection to including this option,
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 6:00 AM, Dominik Vogt v...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
I'd still like to avoid the rampant duplication if possible. One
approach would be to put most of the test in something like
nilptr_tests.go marked with // skip. Then we can have top-level
nilptrXX.go tests with
On 10/21/2014 05:32 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 10/21/2014 05:16 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/21/14 14:15, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
Since everything in ptx assembly is typed, KR C is problematic. There
are a number of testcases that call functions with the wrong number of
arguments, or arguments of
On 10/30/2014 12:35 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
A nit -- Richard S. recently removed the need to include the enum
for enum machine_mode. I believe he had a script to handle the
mundane parts of that change. Please make sure to update the nvptx port
to conform to that new convention, obviously feel
Hi,
as far as I can see this 4.9/5 regression, where we spuriously warn
about the left shifts in the templates, has to do with r208183, where
Jason replaced c_inhibit_evaluation_warnings fiddling in
tsubst_copy_and_build with two warning_sentinels, on warn_type_limits
and warn_div_by_zero.
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 05:32:49PM +0100, Paolo Carlini wrote:
PR c++/63265
* c-family/c.opt ([Wshift-count-negative, Wshift-count-overflow]): Add.
Note, c-family/ has its own ChangeLog.
Jakub
On 06/11/14 15:00, Renlin Li wrote:
Hi all,
Dose anybody have time to review this?
Kind regards,
Renlin Li
On 31/10/14 14:51, Renlin Li wrote:
Hi all,
This is a patch which will fix PR63424.
It implements signed/unsigned max/min pattern for V2DI mode in terms
of vcondv2div2di pattern.
On 06/11/14 18:07, Renlin Li wrote:
On 06/11/14 17:59, Teresa Johnson wrote:
Thanks for fixing the test case. Can you also add the comment I
suggested to the source change?
Please add a comment that this is needed due to insane incoming
frequencies.
Sorry, I mistakenly add it to the
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
