On 05/12/2015 02:16 PM, Marat Zakirov wrote:
On 04/07/2015 03:22 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
How are the automatic misaligned variables different from say heap
allocated ones, or global vars etc.?
No difference you are right Jakub. Shadow memory initialization for
heap values and globals of
Hi!
On Tue, 19 May 2015 09:24:51 +0200, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
On 18-05-15 17:31, Tom de Vries wrote:
In ran into this bootstrap failure with branch gomp-4_0-branch:
...
src/gcc-gomp-4_0-branch/gcc/omp-low.c:2897:1: error: 'omp_context*
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 11:32:20AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Hi!
On Wed, 20 May 2015 10:43:27 +0200, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 10:23:21AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
I see that some checking is also being done gcc/omp-low.c:scan_omp_for:
»gang,
The following patch is an effort to use the macro where appropriate
in c/ and c-family/ directories. No functional changes intended.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
2015-05-20 Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com
* c-pragma.c: Use VAR_OR_FUNCTION_DECL_P throughout.
On 20/05/15 11:17 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 04/05/15 22:31 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
Here is the patch to demangle symbols in debug messages. I have
also simplify code in formatter.h.
Here is an example of assertion message:
Currently, AArch64 don't differentiate -fpic and -fPIC.
For -mcmodel=small, both allow 4G GOT table size, then we always need
two instructions to address GOT entry.
This patch implements -fpic for -mcmodel=small which allow 32K GOT table
size, smaller than -fPIC, but then we can use one
On 20 May 2015 at 16:17, Prathamesh Kulkarni
prathamesh.kulka...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
This patch rejects expanding operator-list to implicit 'for'.
On second thoughts, should we reject expansion of operator-list _only_
if it's mixed with 'for' ?
We could define multiple operator-lists in
Hi,
On Tue, 19 May 2015, Richard Henderson wrote:
It is. The relaxation that HJ is working on requires that the reads
from the got not be hoisted. I'm not especially convinced that what
he's working on is a win.
With LTO, the compiler can do the same job that he's attempting in the
On 04/05/15 22:31 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
Here is the patch to demangle symbols in debug messages. I have
also simplify code in formatter.h.
Here is an example of assertion message:
/home/fdt/dev/gcc/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/debug/functions.h:213:
Hi,
This patch rejects expanding operator-list to implicit 'for'.
OK for trunk after bootstrap+testing ?
Thanks,
Prathamesh
2015-05-20 Prathamesh Kulkarni prathamesh.kulka...@linaro.org
* genmatch.c (parser::record_operlist): Remove.
(parser::oper_lists_set): Likewise.
Similar to the rename from SYMBOL_SMALL_TPREL to SYMBOL_TLSLE, this
patch rename the rtl pattern name.
ok for trunk?
2015-05-19 Jiong Wang jiong.w...@arm.com
gcc/
* config/aarch64/aarch64.md (tlsle_small): Rename to tlsle.
(tlsle_small_mode): Rename to tlsle_mode.
*
On Wed, 20 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
Hi,
This patch rejects expanding operator-list to implicit 'for'.
OK for trunk after bootstrap+testing ?
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
gcc/
* config/mips/mips.h (micromips_globals): Declare.
OK, thanks.
Matthew
Committed as r223438.
Robert
No functional changes.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, applying to trunk.
2015-05-20 Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com
* cfgexpand.c (expand_debug_expr): Use UNARY_CLASS_P.
* c-omp.c (check_omp_for_incr_expr): Use BINARY_CLASS_P.
diff --git gcc/c-family/c-omp.c
On Wed, 20 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 16:17, Prathamesh Kulkarni
prathamesh.kulka...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
This patch rejects expanding operator-list to implicit 'for'.
On second thoughts, should we reject expansion of operator-list _only_
if it's mixed with
Add new unspec name UNSPEC_TLSLE, use it for all tlsle pattern.
ok for trunk?
2015-05-19 Jiong Wang jiong.w...@arm.com
gcc/
* config/aarch64/aarch64.md (UNSPEC_TLSLE): New enumeration.
(tlsle): Use new unspec name.
(tlsle_mode): Ditto.
--
Regards,
Jiong
diff --git
Hi all,
This patch replaces 15, 16, 7 and 8 in aarch64_class_max_nregs with the macro
that they represent.
This should make the logic of that function easier to understand.
Bootstrapped and tested on aarch64.
Applying as obvious.
2015-05-20 Kyrylo Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com
*
On 20 May 2015 at 17:01, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Wed, 20 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 16:17, Prathamesh Kulkarni
prathamesh.kulka...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
This patch rejects expanding operator-list to implicit 'for'.
On second thoughts, should
Use DECL_P where appropriate. No functional changes.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, applying to trunk.
2015-05-20 Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com
* gimple-fold.c (fold_const_aggregate_ref_1): Use DECL_P.
* gimplify.c (gimplify_modify_expr_rhs): Likewise.
*
Use COMPARISON_CLASS_P where appropriate. No functional changes.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, applying to trunk.
2015-05-20 Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com
* expr.c (expand_cond_expr_using_cmove): Use COMPARISON_CLASS_P.
* gimple-expr.c
For AArch64, TLS local-exec mode for all memory model (tiny/small/large)
is actually the same.
TLS LE Instruction generation depends on how big tls section is instead
of the memory model used.
The four instruction sequences we can implement based on relocations
provided:
sequence 1
==
To implement OpenACC vector-single mode, we need to ensure that only one
thread out of the group representing a worker executes. The others skip
computations but follow along the CFG, so the results of conditional
branch decisions must be broadcast to them.
The patch below adds a new builtin
From: Steven Bosscher [mailto:stevenb@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 7:21 PM
Not OK.
This will break in move_invariants() when it looks at REGNO (inv-reg).
Indeed. I'm even surprised all tests passed. Ok I will just prevent moving
in such a case. I'm running the tests now and
Hi!
On Wed, 20 May 2015 10:43:27 +0200, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 10:23:21AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
I see that some checking is also being done gcc/omp-low.c:scan_omp_for:
»gang, worker and vector may occur only once in a loop nest«, and »gang,
Hi,
This patch removes redundant gimple_build_nop calls from tree-chkp.c.
MPX-bootstrapped and regtested for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Applied to trunk.
Thanks,
Ilya
--
2015-05-20 Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com
* tree-chkp.c (chkp_maybe_copy_and_register_bounds): Remove
This is a new version of the patch submitted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg00663.html
but handling (some) escape sequences.
I could not figure out a way to re-use the code from libcpp for this,
thus I implemented a simple function that given a string and offset in
bytes,
Hi!
On Fri, 15 May 2015 11:10:21 -0700, Cesar Philippidis ce...@codesourcery.com
wrote:
This patch teaches the c and c++ front ends to error on invalid and
conflicting acc loop clauses. E.g., an acc loop cannot have 'gang seq'
and the worker and vector clauses inside parallel regions cannot
Hi Mikael,
when I got you right on IRC, then you proposed this change about the pointer
attribute:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c b/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c
index 6d565ae..545f778 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c
@@ -5361,6 +5361,7 @@ gfc_trans_allocate
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 10:23:21AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
+ if (gwv auto_clause)
+c_parser_error (parser, incompatible use of clause %auto%);
+ else if (gwv seq_clause)
+c_parser_error (parser, incompatible use of clause %seq%);
+ else if (auto_clause seq_clause)
+
On Wed, 20 May 2015, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Richard,
this is my attempt to make sense of TYPE_CANONICAL at LTO. My undrestanding
is
that gimple_canonical_types_compatible_p needs to return true for all pairs of
types that are considered compatible across compilation unit for any of
languages
On 03/05/15 22:19 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
On 30/04/2015 13:18, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 30/04/15 10:40 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
On 27/04/2015 13:55, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
(Alternatively, could the same simplification be made for
__miter_base? Do we need _Miter_base or just two
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:01:21PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
The following patch is an effort to use the macro where appropriate
in c/ and c-family/ directories. No functional changes intended.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
2015-05-20 Marek Polacek
Hi,
As we know, GCC is too conservative when checking overflow behavior in SCEV
and loop related optimizers. Result is some variable can't be recognized as
scalar evolution and thus optimizations are missed. To be specific,
optimizers like ivopts and vectorizer are affected.
This issue is more
We could add -mflip-micromips complementing -mflip-mips16 and use
that for testing too. Chances are it'd reveal further issues.
Looking at how
-mflip-mips16 has been implemented it does not appear to me adding
-mflip-micromips would be a lot of effort.
I'm in favour of adding such a
On 18 May 2015 at 20:25, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
On May 18, 2015, at 8:01 AM, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
Simulators such as qemu report the presence of fork (it's in glibc) but
generally do not support synchronization primitives between threads, so any
tests
On Wed, 20 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
On 19 May 2015 at 14:34, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Tue, 19 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
On 18 May 2015 at 20:17, Prathamesh Kulkarni
prathamesh.kulka...@linaro.org wrote:
On 18 May 2015 at 14:12, Richard Biener
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Aditya K hiradi...@msn.com wrote:
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 11:33:16 +0200
Subject: Re: Refactor gimple_expr_type
From: richard.guent...@gmail.com
To: hiradi...@msn.com
CC: tbsau...@tbsaunde.org; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
I bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux the patch bellow. If it will work
for Firefox and Chrome I will go ahead with it at least temporarily.
Really? This introduced a LTO failure in the gnat.dg testsuite:
FAIL: gnat.dg/lto8.adb (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gnat.dg/lto8.adb (test for
On 05/20/2015 01:19 AM, Christian Bruel wrote:
Hi,
Could a global reviewer have a look at the c-family part ?, this is
blocking for the TARGET_CPU_CPP_BUILTINS macro redefinition in C (arm
but probably others)
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-05/msg01185.html
The c-family bits are OK.
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 11:11:52 +0200
Subject: Re: Refactor gimple_expr_type
From: richard.guent...@gmail.com
To: hiradi...@msn.com
CC: tbsau...@tbsaunde.org; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Aditya K hiradi...@msn.com
On 05/20/2015 02:15 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
This is a new version of the patch submitted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg00663.html
but handling (some) escape sequences.
I could not figure out a way to re-use the code from libcpp for this,
thus I implemented a
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 02:01:44PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
To implement OpenACC vector-single mode, we need to ensure that only one
thread out of the group representing a worker executes. The others skip
computations but follow along the CFG, so the results of conditional branch
decisions
On Wed, 20 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 17:01, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Wed, 20 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 16:17, Prathamesh Kulkarni
prathamesh.kulka...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
This patch rejects expanding
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Lynn A. Boger
labo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 05/19/2015 07:52 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 07:40:15AM -0500, Lynn A. Boger wrote:
Questions on the use of the options for split stack:
- The way this is implemented, split stack is
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Alan Modra amo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 02:05:59PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 10:54 PM, Alan Modra amo...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch changes rs6000_stack_info to keep save areas offsets even
when not used. I need
Le 20/05/2015 10:24, Andre Vehreschild a écrit :
Hi Mikael,
when I got you right on IRC, then you proposed this change about the pointer
attribute:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c b/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c
index 6d565ae..545f778 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c
+++
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 09:02:40AM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Alan Modra amo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 02:05:59PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 10:54 PM, Alan Modra amo...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch changes
On 05/19/2015 07:52 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 07:40:15AM -0500, Lynn A. Boger wrote:
Questions on the use of the options for split stack:
- The way this is implemented, split stack is generated if the
target platform supports split stack, on ppc64/ppc64le as well
as on
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 19 May 2015, Richard Henderson wrote:
It is. The relaxation that HJ is working on requires that the reads
from the got not be hoisted. I'm not especially convinced that what
he's working on is a win.
With LTO,
On 20 May 2015 at 18:18, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Wed, 20 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 17:01, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Wed, 20 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 16:17, Prathamesh Kulkarni
This adds functionality to the nvptx backend to emit uni-directional
branches. The idea is to recognize the previously introduced
warp-broadcast pattern; we know that its result is constant across an
entire warp of threads, so any value based on that result has the same
property. If a jump
Current IRA still use both target macros in a few places.
Tell IRA to use the order we defined rather than with it's own cost
calculation. Allocate caller saved first, then callee saved.
This is especially useful for LR/x30, as it's free to allocate and is
pure caller saved when used in leaf
On 05/20/2015 02:39 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 02:01:44PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
To implement OpenACC vector-single mode, we need to ensure that only one
thread out of the group representing a worker executes. The others skip
computations but follow along the CFG, so
Hi All,
Here is updated patch to optimize mask stores. The main goal of it is
to avoid execution of mask store if its mask is zero vector since
loads that follow it can be blocked.
The following changes were done:
1. A test on sink legality was added - it simply prohibits to cross
statements
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 02:10:41PM +0200, Michael Matz wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 19 May 2015, Richard Henderson wrote:
It is. The relaxation that HJ is working on requires that the reads
from the got not be hoisted. I'm not especially convinced that what
he's working on is a win.
On 18/05/15 11:32, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Kyrill Tkachov
kyrylo.tkac...@foss.arm.com wrote:
Hi Richard,
On 13/05/15 12:27, Richard Biener wrote:
I notice that we don't have a testuite check that the target has
a hw sqrt instructions. Would you like me to add
Hi,
Someone privately pointed out that the ARM and AArch64 ports do not
define TARGET_RELAXED_ORDERING given that the architecture(s) mandates a
weak memory model. This patch fixes it for AArch64, the ARM patch
follows in due course after appropriate testing.
I will also note that we can
On 05/20/2015 01:23 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
I included two new test cases in this patch. They are mostly identical
but, unfortunately, the c and c++ front ends emit slightly different
error messages.
The preference is to keep these as single files (so that C and C++ can
easily be
Hi,
On Wed, 20 May 2015, Rich Felker wrote:
of a win that often, outside toy examples. Sure, the compiler can hoist
function addresses trivially, but I think it will lead to spilling more
often than not, or alternatively the hoisting will be undone by the
register allocators
On 05/15/2015 09:37 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
Version 2 includes proper test cases and documentation.
Hopefully the documentation even makes sense. Suggestions
and improvements there gratefully appreciated.
r~
---
gcc/config/i386/constraints.md | 5 ++
On 04/20/2015 04:32 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
I also wonder if other targets need -fasynchronous-unwind-tables and
whether or not we should just add it unconditionally.
I initially only tested powerpc64* and x86_64. I had tried s370
but asan doesn't appear to be built there (is it not
On 20 May 2015 at 15:33, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
So if I'm understanding the situation correctly, with this new version
behaviour for non-concatenated tokens is preserved which was the only
behaviour regression in the prior patch, right?
The new version will also handle most escape
I want to explicitly pass -std=c++98 to the compiler used in building
stage 1. Does this seem like the right way to do that?
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
commit 97e77ef17e558cdb6d26d440e691fea710e2a2dc
Author: Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com
Date: Mon May 18 23:58:41 2015 -0400
*
As discussed in the thread starting at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2014-05/msg00027.html when
__make_move_if_noexcept_iterator decides not to move it returns a
mutable iterator, which can then result in the wrong constructor being
used. This ensures that when not moving we will get a
Add various new tests to Wmisleading-indentation.c:
* Ensure that users can use pragma to turn off
-Wmisleading-indentation for a range of code.
* Add functions demonstrating a variety of indentation styles
seen:
(a) on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indent_style
(b) via
On 05/02/2015 04:16 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
This extends' static assert to not require a message string.
I elected to make this work also for C++11 and C++14 and warn only with
-pedantic.
I think many people just write
static_assert(thing, );
.
I took the path of building an empty string
On 05/20/2015 09:43 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
Add various new tests to Wmisleading-indentation.c:
* Ensure that users can use pragma to turn off
-Wmisleading-indentation for a range of code.
* Add functions demonstrating a variety of indentation styles
seen:
(a) on
These fix the remaining leaks in the threader that I'm aware of. We
failed to properly clean-up when we had to cancel certain jump threading
opportunities. So thankfully this wasn't a big leak.
Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Installed on the trunk.
Jeff
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Max Filippov jcmvb...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-05-20 Max Filippov jcmvb...@gmail.com
gcc/
* config/xtensa/xtensa.c (init_alignment_context): Replace MULT
by BITS_PER_UNIT with ASHIFT by exact_log2 (BITS_PER_UNIT).
Approved, please apply.
This patch fixes the false positive seen from -Wmisleading-indentation
on this code:
if (v == 2)
{
res = 27;
} else
{
res = 18;
}
return res;
^ FALSE POSITIVE HERE
along with similar code seen when I tested it with linux-4.0.3.
The patch adds a reject
Anytime go code built with gccgo is linked against libraries
built with gcc (without split stack) there could be mixing of split stack
and non split stack code. I think that will be a common case.
My understanding is that if you don't use the gold linker in these
cases, it is possible that the
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 10:36:25AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
These fix the remaining leaks in the threader that I'm aware of. We failed
to properly clean-up when we had to cancel certain jump threading
opportunities. So thankfully this wasn't a big leak.
Bootstrapped and regression tested
On 15/05/15 19:37 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Testing revealed a few bugs in how I handled paths that don't exist.
The new __gnu_test::nonexistent_path() function is a bit hacky but
should be good enough for the testsuite.
This makes it even hackier but avoids linker warnings for using the
On 05/20/2015 09:21 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
What I don't see is any way to know if the target supports asm flag outputs.
Are we expecting the kernel folks to do some kind of test then enable/disable
based on the result?
I'd forgotten that we'd talked about a cpp symbol.
I'll add that.
r~
It seems I made an off-by-one error in my last patch for multiple
locations. This only affected the position of the caret character,
which we don't test (since the testsuite uses
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret). Fixed thusly and added a comment to
remind me and others that locations start at 1, but
On 05/20/2015 10:08 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
I don't particularly like file scoped offset_is_invalid variable. It
appears that it's only set within check_format_arg, but it's used from a
variety of other locations via location_from_offset. Given the current
structure of the code,
Well, these kinds of asm are inherently target specific, but I did already ask
for a cpp symbol to indicate this faculty us available.
On May 20, 2015 9:21:07 AM PDT, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/15/2015 09:37 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
Version 2 includes proper test cases and
Hi,
the attached patch enables some PIE tests on FreeBSD.
Ok for trunk?
Thanks,
Andreas
2015-05-20 Andreas Tobler andre...@gcc.gnu.org
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-1.c: Enable test on FreeBSD.
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-2.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-3.c:
On 20.05.15 21:49, John Marino wrote:
I have maintained unwind support for FreeBSD i386 and x86_64 in my
gnat-aux repository for many years (I created it). I've always
intended on contributing it back to GCC, but I never got around to
proving it worked until now.
The version I've been using
commit 8824b5ecba26cef065e47b34609c72677c3c36fc
Author: Aldy Hernandez al...@redhat.com
Date: Wed May 20 16:31:14 2015 -0400
Set DECL_IGNORED_P on temporary arrays created in the switch
conversion pass.
diff --git a/gcc/tree-switch-conversion.c b/gcc/tree-switch-conversion.c
This is the first in a series of patches to fix the fallout from recent
combiner changes in how shift-add style insns are canonicalized.
This patch effectively just adds a new shift-add insn to the PA port.
The old shift-add insn stays for now, but will be removed in a follow-up
once I'm
On Wed, 20 May 2015, Alex Velenko wrote:
Hi,
This patch prevents arm_thumb1_ok XPASS in sibcall-3.c and sibcall-4.c
testcases. Sibcalls are not ok for Thumb1 and testcases need to be fixed.
arm_thumb1_ok means this is an ARM target where -mthumb causes Thumb-1 to
be used. It only ever
How does this version, which has been committed to the debug-early
branch, look?
One more thing Richi. I merged trunk into the branch once again, and Go
broke. I tracked it down to a temporary that was being created late
that IMO shouldn't even get debug info.
The fact that it gets
On Tue, 19 May 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
Here is the complete patch. Tested on Linux/x86-64. It is also
available on hjl/pie/master branch in git mirror.
OK a week after you CC all relevant target maintainers on the patch, in
the absence of objections from those target maintainers.
--
Joseph
On 05/20/2015 03:18 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 05/08/2015 09:14 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
+ if (!flag_syntax_only)
+c_parse_final_cleanups ();
The condition is a significant change of behavior for the C++ front end;
doing final instantiation and such even with -fsyntax-only was a
On Wed, 20 May 2015, Alex Velenko wrote:
Hi,
This patch limits testcase split-live-ranges-for-shrink-wrap.c runs to
supported achitecture versions.
Object size with -march=armv4t check fails because pop pc is not interworking
safe on armv4t.
This test is not supported for -march=armv7 as
On 05/20/2015 11:05 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
This patch fixes the false positive seen from -Wmisleading-indentation
on this code:
if (v == 2)
{
res = 27;
} else
{
res = 18;
}
return res;
^ FALSE POSITIVE HERE
along with similar code seen
register_specialization complains about a specialization in a different
namespace from the main template; we shouldn't give that error about an
instantiation of a partial specialization. And we were about to
SET_DECL_IMPLICIT_INSTANTIATION anyway, so let's just do that before we
call
As described in PR target/63810, this addresses several problems with
the validation and encoding of deployment target version strings for the
__ENVIRONMENT_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED__ macro. There are
currently four testcases exercising inputs to -mmacosx-version-min
On 05/20/2015 11:04 AM, Andreas Tobler wrote:
Hi,
the attached patch enables some PIE tests on FreeBSD.
Ok for trunk?
Thanks,
Andreas
2015-05-20 Andreas Tobler andre...@gcc.gnu.org
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-1.c: Enable test on FreeBSD.
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-2.c: Likewise.
On 05/20/2015 05:01 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
commit 8824b5ecba26cef065e47b34609c72677c3c36fc
Author: Aldy Hernandez al...@redhat.com
Date: Wed May 20 16:31:14 2015 -0400
Set DECL_IGNORED_P on temporary arrays created in the switch
conversion pass.
diff --git
I noticed that -Wc++14-compat was warning about headers that had been
updated to include a declaration of a global sized operator delete.
This was intended to catch problematic placement deletes, but now I
think that C++14 headers that just don't bother to guard the declaration
with a C++14
Update for the c-family bits removing the flag_syntax_only part Jason
requested.
And BTW, ping for you C front-end maintainers (unless Jason is reviewing
the C bits, in which case the rest of you can sit back and look pretty).
Aldy
gcc/c-family/
* c-common.h (c_parse_final_cleanups): New
On 20/05/2015 12:19, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 20/05/15 11:17 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 04/05/15 22:31 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
Here is the patch to demangle symbols in debug messages. I have
also simplify code in formatter.h.
Here is an example of assertion message:
This is OK if GCC bootstraps.
Thanks.
Ian
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Yunlian Jiang yunl...@google.com wrote:
I have the following change to make libiberty compile with _GNU_SOURCE defined
and remove the declaration of asprintf in libiberty.h if
HAVE_DECL_ASPRINTF is not
defined.
Hi,
This patch prevents arm_thumb1_ok XPASS in sibcall-3.c and sibcall-4.c
testcases. Sibcalls are not ok for Thumb1 and testcases need to be fixed.
Is patch ok?
gcc/testsuite
2015-05-20 Alex Velenko alex.vele...@arm.com
* gcc.dg/sibcall-3.c (dg-skip-if): Skip if arm_thumb1_ok.
On 05/20/2015 12:28 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
Yes, this is OK for the trunk. Please commit.
jeff
Applied to trunk (revision 223454).
--
Regards,
Mikhail Maltsev
I have the following change to make libiberty compile with _GNU_SOURCE defined
and remove the declaration of asprintf in libiberty.h if
HAVE_DECL_ASPRINTF is not
defined.
diff --git a/include/libiberty.h b/include/libiberty.h
index b33dd65..8e096a0 100644
--- a/include/libiberty.h
+++
On 05/08/2015 09:14 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
+ if (!flag_syntax_only)
+c_parse_final_cleanups ();
The condition is a significant change of behavior for the C++ front end;
doing final instantiation and such even with -fsyntax-only was a
deliberate choice. Can we drop the condition?
I have maintained unwind support for FreeBSD i386 and x86_64 in my
gnat-aux repository for many years (I created it). I've always
intended on contributing it back to GCC, but I never got around to
proving it worked until now.
The version I've been using actually has two flavors: FreeBSD 8 and
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
