On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Fan You youfan.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
According to
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n4335.html#memory.smartptr
Here is my implementation of
[8.2] Extend shared_ptr to support arrays
Please don't resend the shared_ptr patch, since
On Jul 16, 2015, Alexandre Oliva aol...@redhat.com wrote:
So, I decided to run a ppc64le-linux-gnu bootstrap, just in case, and
there are issues with split complex parms that caused go and fortran
libs to fail the build.
This incremental patch, along with the previously-posted patches, fix
Hi,
I've committed these three obvious patches that fix -Wall warnings in
openacc test-cases to gomp-4_0-branch.
Thanks,
- Tom
Add missing return in private-reduction-1.c
2015-07-17 Tom de Vries t...@codesourcery.com
* c-c++-common/goacc/private-reduction-1.c (reduction): Add missing
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Benedikt Huber
benedikt.hu...@theobroma-systems.com wrote:
* config/aarch64/aarch64-builtins.c: Builtins
for rsqrt and rsqrtf.
* config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h: Declare.
* config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md: Matching expressions
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 1:25 AM, Andrew Pinski pins...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Benedikt Huber
benedikt.hu...@theobroma-systems.com wrote:
* config/aarch64/aarch64-builtins.c: Builtins
for rsqrt and rsqrtf.
* config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h:
Hi Chung-Lin,
when compiling f.i. kernels-loop-acc-loop.c with -Wall, I ran into:
...
In file included from kernels-loop-acc-loop.c:8:0:
kernels-loop.c: In function ‘main’:
kernels-loop.c:30:0: warning: ignoring #pragma ACC_LOOP [-Wunknown-pragmas]
...
kernels-loop-acc-loop.c contains:
...
On July 17, 2015 11:28:28 PM GMT+02:00, Ulrich Weigand uweig...@de.ibm.com
wrote:
On July 17, 2015 6:54:32 PM GMT+02:00, Ulrich Weigand
uweig...@de.ibm.com wrote:
So do we now consider host compilers 4.3 (4?) unsupported for
building
mainline GCC, or should we try to work around the issue
Hi Nathan!
On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 20:25:22 -0400, Nathan Sidwell nat...@acm.org wrote:
This is the patch I committed. [...]
Prompted by your recent -O0 patch to »[f]ix PTX worker spill/fill«, I
used the attached patch 0001-O0-libgomp-C-C-testing.patch to run all C
and C++ libgomp testing with -O0
We have to reject misaligned insertions and extractions from
ix86_expand_pextr and ix86_expand_pinsr.
2015-07-18 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
PR target/66922
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_pextr): Reject extractions
from misaligned positions.
(ix86_expand_pinsr): Reject
Robert Suchanek robert.sucha...@imgtec.com writes:
@@ -771,7 +771,8 @@ struct mips_cpu_info {
/* Infer a -mnan=2008 setting from a -mips argument. */
#define MIPS_ISA_NAN2008_SPEC \
- %{mnan*:;mips32r6|mips64r6:-mnan=2008}
+ %{mnan*:;mips32r6|mips64r6:-mnan=2008;march=m51*: \
+
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 02:47:34PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
I mean move the whole if (BINARY_P ... block to after the existing
simplify calls, to just before the First see if we can apply comment,
and not do a new simplify_rtx call at all. Does that work?
Yes, and here's the patch.
It just
Hello,
This patch is an attempt to fix PR rtl-optimization/66790: please see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66790 for the context.
This adds a new dataflow problem (MIR for Must-Initialized Registers)
and use it in the REE pass to remove oversights, fixing the original issue.
Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com writes:
Robert Suchanek robert.sucha...@imgtec.com writes:
@@ -771,7 +771,8 @@ struct mips_cpu_info {
/* Infer a -mnan=2008 setting from a -mips argument. */
#define MIPS_ISA_NAN2008_SPEC \
- %{mnan*:;mips32r6|mips64r6:-mnan=2008}
+
From: Trevor Saunders tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org
The debug-early branch renamed vmsdbgout_decl to
vmsdbgout_function_decl, but didn't update its prototype.
checked that the alpha and ia64 vms targets in config-list.mk can now build
all-gcc, and committing to trunk as obvious.
Trev
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Kyrill Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com wrote:
Hi all,
This patch improves codegen for expressions of the form:
(x ? y + c1 : y + c2) when |c1 - c2| == 1
It matches the if_then_else of the two plus-immediates,
performs one of them, then generates a conditional
15 matches
Mail list logo