On 07/07/2015 04:48 PM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Hi build machinery maintainers,
when the host system does not have the iconv-devel package installed,
but the target-prefix does contain iconv.h, in libstdc++/include the
creation of the precompiled headers fails with iconv.h not found.
2015-07-24 7:54 GMT+02:00 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com:
On 07/23/2015 10:33 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:09:49AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
It seems to me in these kind of cases that selection of the canonical
form should be driven by factors outside of which is better
Hi all,
This transformation folds (X % C) == N into
X ((1 (size - 1)) | (C - 1))) == N
for constants C and N where N is positive and C is a power of 2.
The idea is similar to the existing X % C - X (C - 1) transformation
for unsigned values but this time when we have the comparison we use
Hi,
I think this can go in, given Jason's feedback in the audit trail of the
bug. I'm going to wait until the end of the day, anyway. Tested
x86_64-linux.
Thanks,
Paolo.
2015-07-24 Manuel López-Ibáñez m...@gcc.gnu.org
PR c++/64079
* toplev.c
On 22/07/15 10:11, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 05:59:39PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Sorry, here's the correct version, which uses initialized instead of inited in
one of the variable names.
Some nits below.
Kyrill
2015-07-21 Kyrylo Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/20/2015 09:05 AM, Yuri Rumyantsev wrote:
Hi Jeff!
Thanks for your details comments.
You asked:
How are conditionals on vectors usually handled? You should try to
mimick that and report, with detail, why that's not
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
2015-07-24 7:54 GMT+02:00 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com:
On 07/23/2015 10:33 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:09:49AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
It seems to me in these kind of cases that selection of
I love this idea and had similar thoughts as well.
:D
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 24, 2015, at 1:06 AM, Paul Richard Thomas
paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Mikael,
It had crossed my mind also that a .mod and a .smod file could be
written. Normally, the .smod files are
On 20/07/15 17:44, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 04:20:37PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
This one is more meaty than the previous ones. It buffs up the parsing
functions for
the mcpu, march, mtune options, decouples them and makes them return an enum
describing
the
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 09:09:39AM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
This transformation folds (X % C) == N into
X ((1 (size - 1)) | (C - 1))) == N
for constants C and N where N is positive and C is a power of 2.
The idea is similar to the existing X % C - X (C - 1) transformation
for
The stmt interface for gimple_simplify currently does not return
changed when valueization would change it (it does if canonicalization
does). This causes missed optimizations compared to the fold based
code in fold_stmt.
Fixed as follows which runs into the issue that for variadic builtins
On 17/07/15 20:45, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 07/17/2015 06:37 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi Sandra,
On 17/07/15 04:21, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 07/16/2015 09:21 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
This patch adds the documentation for the AArch64 target attributes and
pragmas.
Ok for
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 03:03:29PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Oh, I agree this will not be *used*. I just wanted to point out that it
will not *break* cross-compilers as is.
I've just verified that cross compilation *does* work at the
moment with the patches quoted in some earlier post.
I have to re-test the following because of an exposed bug in the C++
frontend which fed fold_binary with a signed long sizetype compare
with mismatched types.
The patch moves canonicalization of comparison codes to minimize
an involved constant, like X = 5 to X 4, to match.pd.
The C++ part I
On 24/07/15 10:00, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 24/07/15 09:23, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 09:09:39AM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
This transformation folds (X % C) == N into
X ((1 (size - 1)) | (C - 1))) == N
for constants C and N
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Kyrill Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com wrote:
It arrives as SSA_NAME == N and you can use get_gimple_for_ssa_name
or get_def_for_expr to get at the defining stmt if that is possible
(it's still unexpanded and thus TERed) and expand a different
expression.
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 10:23:59AM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 24/07/15 10:09, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 09:48:30AM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Bootstrapped and tested on arm, aarch64, x86_64.
I think this is another case that, if at all, should be done during or
In expr.c, with TER you can detect such patterns, in this case when
expanding the comparison, but perhaps we want a *.pd file that would have
rules that would be only GIMPLE and only enabled in a special pass right
before (or very close to) expansion, that would perform such instruction
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 09:50:55PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
Here, I note that the xxd tool is being used, which in my distribution is
part of the Vim editor's package, which -- as far as I know -- is not
currently declared as a build dependency of GCC?
We have a patch, which checks for
On 21/07/15 18:14, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 04:21:15PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
These are the tests for target attributes and pragmas.
I've tried to test for the inlining rules, some of the possible errors and
the preprocessor macros changed from target
Jeff,
The goal of this transformation is to not execute masked store if
possible,i.e. when is is equal to zero-vector. and conditional
expression is not suitable for it - we must generate semi-hammock with
conditional branch.
Yuri.
2015-07-23 23:03 GMT+03:00 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com:
On
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 24/07/15 09:23, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 09:09:39AM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
This transformation folds (X % C) == N into
X ((1 (size - 1)) | (C - 1))) == N
for constants C and N where N is positive and C is a
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 09:48:30AM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Bootstrapped and tested on arm, aarch64, x86_64.
I think this is another case that, if at all, should be done during or right
before RTL expansion and should test rtx costs.
Hmm, where would that be?
That is up to discussions,
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 1:19 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 4:14 PM, David Edelsohn dje@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 5:59 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:57 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23,
On 23/07/15 21:38, Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/13/2015 08:03 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
2015-07-13 Kyrylo Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com
* ifcvt.c (struct noce_if_info): Add then_simple, else_simple,
then_cost, else_cost fields. Change branch_cost field to unsigned
int.
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 24/07/15 10:09, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 09:48:30AM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Bootstrapped and tested on arm, aarch64, x86_64.
I think this is another case that, if at all, should be done during or
right
On 21 July 2015 at 16:37, James Greenhalgh james.greenha...@arm.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 04:20:59PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
+static bool
+aarch64_process_one_target_attr (char *arg_str, const char* pragma_or_attr)
+{
+ bool ret;
+ bool invert = false;
+
+ int len =
Dear Mikael,
It had crossed my mind also that a .mod and a .smod file could be
written. Normally, the .smod files are produced by the submodules
themselves, so that their descendants can pick up the symbols that
they generate. There is no reason at all why this could not be
implemented; early on
On July 24, 2015 7:30:03 AM GMT+02:00, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/23/2015 04:44 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On July 23, 2015 7:43:51 PM GMT+02:00, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 07/22/2015 09:29 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
While looking at PR c/16351, I noticed that
This moves some points-to related comparison simplification.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied to trunk.
Richard.
2015-07-24 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
* genmatch.c (add_operator): Allow SSA_NAME as predicate.
* fold-const.c
On 21/07/15 17:52, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 04:21:05PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
This patch implements target pragmas for aarch64.
The pragmas accepted are the same as for target attributes (as required).
In addition pragmas will need to redefine the
On 24/07/15 09:23, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 09:09:39AM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
This transformation folds (X % C) == N into
X ((1 (size - 1)) | (C - 1))) == N
for constants C and N where N is positive and C is a power of 2.
The idea is similar to the existing X % C -
James Greenhalgh writes:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 01:35:41PM +0100, Jiong Wang wrote:
Current IRA still use both target macros in a few places.
Tell IRA to use the order we defined rather than with it's own cost
calculation. Allocate caller saved first, then callee saved.
This is
On 24/07/15 10:09, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 09:48:30AM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Bootstrapped and tested on arm, aarch64, x86_64.
I think this is another case that, if at all, should be done during or right
before RTL expansion and should test rtx costs.
Hmm, where
The following patch implements the simplest approach of splitting
the huge functions in gimple-match.c (not yet generic-match.c).
In my dev tree it does:
build/genmatch --gimple /space/rguenther/tramp3d/trunk/gcc/match.pd \
tmp-gimple-match.c
GIMPLE decision tree has 696 leafs, maximum
On 22 July 2015 at 18:13, Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com wrote:
Same as
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04/msg01387.html
but for AArch64.
-dynamic-linker is only passed to the linker if !static !shared.
-rdynamic handling is changed too to be consistent with arm:
only pass
On 21/07/15 16:37, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 04:20:59PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
This patch implements target attribute support via the
TARGET_OPTION_VALID_ATTRIBUTE_P hook.
The aarch64_handle_option function in common/config/aarch64/aarch64-common.c is
Hi all,
This third patch implements the same algorithm as patch 1/3 but for arm.
That is, for X % N where N is a power of 2 we do:
rsbsr1, r0, #0
and r0, r0, #(N - 1)
and r1, r1, #(N - 1)
rsbpl r0, r1, #0
For the special case where N is 2 we do the shorter:
cmp r0, #0
Hi all,
This patch implements an aarch64-specific expansion of the signed modulo by a
power of 2.
The proposed sequence makes use of the conditional negate instruction CSNEG.
For a power of N, x % N can be calculated with:
negs x1, x0
andx0, x0, #(N - 1)
andx1, x1, #(N - 1)
csneg x0,
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Bin.Cheng amker.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Bin Cheng bin.ch...@arm.com wrote:
Hi,
This patch is to fix PR66388. It's an old issue but recently
On 07/17/2015 06:00 PM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
The following series of patches contains fixes, and cleanup work
related to -march=native (and -mtune=native) for S390.
* 0001 Fix cross compilation for S390 targets that was broken with
the original -march=native aptch.
* 0002 Fix
On 20/07/15 15:04, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 16/07/15 12:15, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Tom de Vries
tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
On 16/07/15 10:44, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com
wrote:
Hi,
I.
In
[ was: Re: [PATCH] Check TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS for parloops reductions ]
On 22/07/15 18:13, Tom de Vries wrote:
0003-Check-TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS-for-parloops-reductions.patch
Check TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS for parloops reductions
2015-07-21 Tom de Vriest...@codesourcery.com
*
(-a)*b should not be compiled to vnmul a,b with -frounding-math.
Added a new -(a*b) pattern for vnmul and the old one is only
used if !flag_rounding_math. Updated the costs too.
This is the ARM version of
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg00300.html
Tested with
Hi Szabolcs,
On 24/07/15 12:10, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
(-a)*b should not be compiled to vnmul a,b with -frounding-math.
Added a new -(a*b) pattern for vnmul and the old one is only
used if !flag_rounding_math. Updated the costs too.
This is the ARM version of
Ping. Updated patch attached.
Also, retested the series for arm-none-linux-gnueabihf with native bootstrap and
make check and arm-none-abi with cross-compiled make check.
On 22/06/15 16:41, Matthew Wahab wrote:
Hello,
The ARM backend uses an unsigned long to record CPU feature flags and there
On 13/07/15 16:55, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
this patch fixes PR66851.
In parloops, we manage to parallelize outer loops, but not if the inner
loop contains a reduction. There is an xfail in autopar/outer-4.c for this:
...
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times parallelizing outer loop 1
parloops
Hi all,
As part of patch 3/3 I want to expand to an if_then_else form of a conditional
negate
operation. It seems we already have patterns for that, but they are ancient and
only enabled
for TARGET_ARM. Doing a bit of archaeology I see that they were added in 1997
before Thumb and before
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Bin Cheng bin.ch...@arm.com wrote:
Hi,
This patch is to fix PR66388. It's an old issue but recently became worse
after my scev overflow change. IVOPT now can only compute iv
Ping. Updated patch attached.
Also, retested the series for arm-none-linux-gnueabihf with native bootstrap and
make check and arm-none-eabi with cross-compiled make check.
On 22/06/15 16:45, Matthew Wahab wrote:
Hello,
The ARM backend uses an unsigned long to record CPU feature flags and
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 08:05:00 -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
The second point is interesting. Offloaded functions require the omp
target attribute or that function won't reach the lto compiler. That's
fine because not all targets can handle general code. The problem occurs
when a user
Jim ran into an ICE in a fortran program which contains an acc vector
loop with a call to a subroutine. There are two things going on in here.
First, a couple of functions in tree-nested.c weren't considering the
_GANG, _WORKER, _VECTOR, and _SEQ omp clause codes. Second, the target
lto compiler
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 06:21:34PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 08:05:00 -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
The second point is interesting. Offloaded functions require the omp
target attribute or that function won't reach the lto compiler. That's
fine because not all
See: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66984
Confirmed that GCC trunk bootstraps without issue and
that this patch fixes the issue noted in the GUPC branch.
2015-07-24 Gary Funck g...@intrepid.com
PR middle-end/66984
* fold-const.c (fold_binary_loc): Call
On 07/24/15 08:43:05, Gary Funck wrote:
See: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66984
Confirmed that GCC trunk bootstraps without issue and
that this patch fixes the issue noted in the GUPC branch.
2015-07-24 Gary Funck g...@intrepid.com
PR middle-end/66984
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 09:32:04AM -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 07/21/15 11:21, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 07/21/15 09:25, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
This trunk patch implements new register and unregister entry points to
allow
specifying data version information. (I'll shortly be posting
On 23/07/15 23:54 +0200, Torvald Riegel wrote:
On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 09:21 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 22/07/15 22:30 -0400, Patrick Palka wrote:
Specifically, line 149 of atomix_futex.h has a bare return;
statement, but the function is marked as returning non-void. This was
caught while
Hi,
this patch allows parallelization and vectorization of reduction
operators that are guaranteed to not overflow (such as min and max
operators), independent of the overflow behaviour of the type.
Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64.
OK for trunk?
Thanks,
- Tom
Allow non-overflow ops
The attached patch cleans up cross compilation as discussed here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg01929.html
on top of the fixes that have already been committed; see here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg01545.html
This is only cleanup work, there is no compile
Hi,
Static chain returned from get_rtl_for_parm_ssa_default_def may not
have Pmode. This patch converts static chain to Pmode if needed.
Tested on Linux/x86-64. OK for trunk?
Thanks.
H.J.
---
2015-07-24 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com
PR bootstrap/66978
* function.c
Hi,
movtf is unnecessary as a separate expander. Move this to be with
the standard scalar floating point expanders.
Achieved by adding a new iterator and then using the same.
Tested cross aarch64-none-elf and no regressions.
Ramana
* config/aarch64/aarch.md (movmode:GPF): Use ALLTF.
Find a missing test case for
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg00789.html left at the corner.
Merged with the latest trunk. New test case does not fail on
thumb1/thumb2/arm targets.
ChangeLog:
2015-07-24: Joey Ye joey...@arm.com
* gcc.target/arm/thumb2-pop-single.c: New
On 07/24/15 11:22, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:10:59AM -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
+case OMP_CLAUSE_DEFAULT_NONE:
+ {
+ const char *accn;
Can you rename this variable to something that makes sense?
kind, or construct, or name, or directive?
Hm, yeah,
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 18:30:16 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 09:32:04AM -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 07/21/15 11:21, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 07/21/15 09:25, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
This trunk patch implements new register and unregister entry points to
allow
With that problem fixed I still see one minor glitch. Maybe
someone knows how to fix the following:
* With a cross compiler that generates i686 binaries on s390x:
$ i686-elf-gcc -c ~/foo.c -march=native
/home/vogt/foo.c:1:0: error: bad value (native) for -march= switch
This is all
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 07:21:07AM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
This patch the check for IS_TYPE_OF_DECL_P in this patch. Is this ok for
trunk?
2015-07-24 Cesar Philippidis ce...@codesourcery.com
gcc/
* tree-cfg.c (struct replace_decls_d): New struct.
Dominik Vogt wrote:
gcc/ChangeLog
* config.hosto_plugin_soname): Include driver-native.c only when
building with s390* as host and target.
(There seems to be a typo in the log entry ...)
This is OK.
Thanks,
Ulrich
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
GNU/Linux compilers and toolchain
On 24/07/15 13:50, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
On 22 July 2015 at 18:13, Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com wrote:
Same as
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04/msg01387.html
but for AArch64.
-dynamic-linker is only passed to the linker if !static !shared.
-rdynamic handling is changed
Hello,
I committed the patch for PR64984 that I had posted on bugzilla.
It was approved by Paul:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64986#c13
Mikael
On 07/23/2015 03:11 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 03:01:25PM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
On 07/23/2015 08:32 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 08:20:50AM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
The attached patch does just that; it teaches
Hi,
this patch adds a message to the parloops dump file when
transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt is successful. In the relevant
testcases, we scan for this message, instead of for code patterns,
making the tests more stable.
Committed as trivial.
Thanks,
- Tom
Add
On 07/24/2015 08:21 AM, Ilya Verbin wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 08:05:00 -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
The second point is interesting. Offloaded functions require the omp
target attribute or that function won't reach the lto compiler. That's
fine because not all targets can handle
On 24/07/15 14:20, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
On 22 July 2015 at 18:22, Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com wrote:
2015-07-22 Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com
* config/aarch64/aarch64-elf-raw.h (LINK_SPEC): Handle -h, -static,
-shared, -symbolic, -rdynamic.
OK, this
On 07/22/2015 02:02 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 01:48:03PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 07/22/2015 01:06 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:43:53PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 07/14/2015 09:18 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
Code such as if (i == i) is
Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
Currently bootstrapping and reg-testing on x86_64.
OK for trunk?
OK 5 and 4.9 release branches?
Ok if Sebastian is fine with it.
Ok to backport as well.
Thanks Tom for the patches.
On Jul 24, 2015, David Edelsohn dje@gmail.com wrote:
Did you commit the final, complete version of the patches?
Yes, I have double-checked that reverting the patch I posted on the
r225979 tree I used for testing reverts it to the base revision, except
for unrelated libgfortran configury
On Jul 24, 2015, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Alexandre Oliva aol...@redhat.com wrote:
On Jul 23, 2015, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66983
My test logs with the patch have:
PASS:
Hi,
The attached patch adds additional test for the routine
directive for C/C++/Fortran.
Committed to gomp-4_0-branch.
Jim
diff --git a/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/routine-3.c b/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/routine-3.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..73ca528
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Alexandre Oliva aol...@redhat.com wrote:
On Jul 24, 2015, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Alexandre Oliva aol...@redhat.com wrote:
On Jul 23, 2015, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 10:01 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
#!/usr/bin/python
import sys
with open(sys.argv[1],rb) as f:
nextblock = f.read(12)
while 1:
block = nextblock
nextblock = f.read(12)
if block == :
break
str =
for ch in
Jakub,
in working on openacc default clause handling, I found the logic in
omp_notice_variable a little hard to follow, due to the size of function and
depth of nesting.
I broke out the existing default handling to a separate function, and made the
control flow a bit clearer (IMHO).
ok for
This patch introduces ADJUST_INSN_LENGTH define to i386.h to increase
the length of the insn when bnd prefix is used.
2015-07-24 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
PR target/64003
* config/i386/i386.h (ADJUST_INSN_LENGTH): New define.
* config/i386/i386.md (maybe_prefix_bnd): New
This patch by Chris Manghane fixes the Go frontend so that when moving
expressions to ensure that they are evaluated in the correct order, it
does not bother to move a constant expression. This fixes
https://golang.org/issue/11039 . Bootstrapped and ran Go testsuite on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
On 07/16/2015 06:26 PM, Michael Darling wrote:
Ping. I don't have write access.
**Updated patch ATTACHED**, modified so the commits during the past
two months don't cause conflicts. Minor other updating (i.e. Likewise
rather than repeating in ChangeLogs.)
Binutils **updated patch also
The Go spec says that rune hex literals should start with \x. The Go
frontend was incorrectly accepting \X as well. This patch by Chris
Manghane fixes the problem. This is https://golang.org/issue/11575 .
Bootstrapped and ran Go testsuite on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Committed to mainline.
Ian
On 17/07/15 20:00, pins...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 17, 2015, at 9:58 PM, Kyrill Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com wrote:
On 10/07/15 14:45, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 10/07/15 10:00, pins...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 10, 2015, at 1:47 AM, Kyrill Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com wrote:
Hi
Hi all,
This patch uses std::swap in a few places in the midend, replacing the manual
approach, and removing
a few, now unused, local variables in the process.
Bootstrapped on x86_64.
Committed as obvious with r226179.
Thanks,
Kyrill
2015-07-24 Kyrylo Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com
*
On Jul 24, 2015, H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com wrote:
Static chain returned from get_rtl_for_parm_ssa_default_def may not
have Pmode. This patch converts static chain to Pmode if needed.
Tested on Linux/x86-64. OK for trunk?
Yeah, this looks good to me, thanks. Even the static chain
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Alexandre Oliva aol...@redhat.com wrote:
On Jul 24, 2015, H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com wrote:
Static chain returned from get_rtl_for_parm_ssa_default_def may not
have Pmode. This patch converts static chain to Pmode if needed.
Tested on Linux/x86-64. OK for
Hi,
The attached patch fixes a couple of missing variable
initializations.
Committed to gomp-4_0-branch.
Jim
diff --git a/libgomp/target.c b/libgomp/target.c
index 16283ad..0470d3b 100644
--- a/libgomp/target.c
+++ b/libgomp/target.c
@@ -1130,7 +1130,7 @@ gomp_load_plugin_for_device (struct
On 07/24/2015 03:44 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
In expr.c, with TER you can detect such patterns, in this case when
expanding the comparison, but perhaps we want a *.pd file that would have
rules that would be only GIMPLE and only enabled in a special pass right
before (or very close to)
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:10:59AM -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
2015-07-24 Nathan Sidwell nat...@codesourcery.com
* gimplify.c (omp_default_clause): New function. Reorganize flow
for clarity. Broken out of ...
(omp_notice_variable): ... here.
Ok, except:
+case
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 17:24:55 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 06:21:34PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 08:05:00 -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
The second point is interesting. Offloaded functions require the omp
target attribute or that function
Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/21/2015 02:32 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
Could somebody with access to sourceware.org upload a tar.bz2 of the required
version of isl from http://isl.gforge.inria.fr/isl-0.15.tar.bz2?
Also, once that is done, I will commit the following patch updating the
On 24 July 2015 at 21:30, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/24/2015 07:45 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
On 23 July 2015 at 19:43, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
Warning in the front-ends like this can generate false positives (such as
a
NULL return in an unreachable path and miss
On 06/26/2015 12:33 AM, Alexander Basov wrote:
2015-06-25 21:47 GMT+03:00 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com:
On 06/03/2015 02:15 PM, Alexander Basov wrote:
Hello Jeff,
please find updated patch attached
diff --git a/gcc/cfgexpand.c b/gcc/cfgexpand.c
index b190f91..c6db8a9 100644
---
On 24/07/15 18:29, Uros Bizjak wrote:
This patch introduces ADJUST_INSN_LENGTH define to i386.h to increase
the length of the insn when bnd prefix is used.
2015-07-24 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
PR target/64003
* config/i386/i386.h (ADJUST_INSN_LENGTH): New define.
*
On 07/24/2015 03:53 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/21/2015 02:32 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
Could somebody with access to sourceware.org upload a tar.bz2 of the required
version of isl from http://isl.gforge.inria.fr/isl-0.15.tar.bz2?
Also, once that is done, I will commit the
These checks are already present in is_va_list_char_pointer.
2015-07-25 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_va_start): Remove
unneeded !TARGET_64BIT check.
(ix86_gimplify_va_arg): Ditto.
Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu {,-m32}.
When trying to analyze why Graphite does not handle a loop nest, it is easy to
look in the dumps of -fdump-tree-graphite-all to guess what has to be changed to
catch the loop. This patch makes the dumps a bit more verbose and useful.
---
gcc/graphite-scop-detection.c | 72
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
