Someone pointed out that we were missing feature test macros for some
recently implemented C++1z features; this patch fixes that.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
commit cb8271fe1b49b984fa38dc6cf1d3ed25462afd20
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Sun Oct 18 10:15:36
N4268 is the last bullet point remaining for C++1z features until
Saturday, when presumably more stuff will be added. The basic
functionality is quite straightforward: first generalize parsing, then
pass all arguments through maybe_constant_value. But to get correct
handling of pointers to
On 10/15/2015 06:25 AM, Arkadiusz Drabczyk wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 06:18:03PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
>On 10/14/2015 03:42 PM, Arkadiusz Drabczyk wrote:
> >On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 08:36:43AM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> >>On 10/13/2015 04:47 PM, Arkadiusz Drabczyk wrote:
> >>>*
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 08:10:32PM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> On 19/10/15 14:04, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> >On 19/10/15 12:12, Alan Modra wrote:
> >>On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 06:50:50PM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> >>>A powerpc toolchain built with (or without) --enable-secureplt
> >>>currently
On 10/14/2015 01:15 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 10/14/2015 07:43 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
Obviously some pessimization relative to current code is necessary to
fix some of the problems WRT thread safety and avoiding things like
introducing faults in code which did not previously fault.
Huh? This
On 14/10/15 23:02, Charles Baylis wrote:
On 12 October 2015 at 11:58, Alan Lawrence wrote:
>
Given we are making changes here to how this all works on bigendian, have
you tested armeb at all?
I tested on big endian, and it passes, except
Well, I asked because it
On 10/19/2015 05:06 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
It appeared our testsuite doesn't have a test which would require vector
comparison support in SLP even after boolean pattern disabling. This patch
adds such tests and allow comparison for SLP. Is it OK?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2015-10-19
Hi!
Ping...
On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 12:15:24 +0200, I wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 16:14:17 +0200, I wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Jun 2015 03:39:42 +0300, Ilmir Usmanov wrote:
> > > 08.06.2015, 17:59, "Cesar Philippidis" :
> > > > On 06/07/2015 02:05 PM, Ilmir Usmanov
Hello.
Following tarball is made of patches that rename class member variables to
respect
C++ coding style, where all member variables should begin with 'm_'.
Martin
hsa-class-refactoring.tar.bz2
Description: application/bzip
On October 19, 2015 4:42:23 PM GMT+02:00, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>The fold code also expanded cabs(x+yi) to fsqrt(x*x+y*y) when
>optimising
>for speed. tree-ssa-math-opts.c has this transformation too, but
>unlike
>the fold code, it first checks whether the target
I've committed this patch to gomp4 branch.
It implements handling of the 'auto' clause on a loop. such loops can be
implicitly partitioned, if they are (explicitly or implicitly) 'independent'.
This patch walks the loop structure after explicit partitioning has been
handled, and attempts to
On 10/20/2015 12:07 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 03:57:31PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
I don't see why the C FE would need to invoke finish_decl twice here.
[...]
So I'd rather
have the C frontend not invoke rest_of_decl_compilation on this in the
first place.
Your patch
On 10/13/2015 06:53 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On 12/10/15 21:44, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/09/2015 03:17 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
This started as a Friday afternoon project ...
It turned out enabling VTV for AArch64 and ARM was a matter of fixing
PR67868 which essentially comes
If I hack up GCC's old jump threader to avoid threading across backedges
and instead let the FSM threader handle that case, then we end up with
cases where the FSM threader creates irreducible loops with marginal
benefit.
This can be seen in ssa-dom-thread-2{d,e,f}.c.
We've long avoided such
Hi!
Chung-Lin, would you please have a look at the following (on
gomp-4_0-branch)? Also, anyone else got any ideas off-hand?
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 13:51:39 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 02:40:43PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at
On 10/19/2015 09:14 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/15/2015 10:28 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 10/13/2015 11:32 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/13/2015 02:21 AM, Nikolai Bozhenov wrote:
2015-10-13 Nikolai Bozhenov
* gcc/rtl.h (print_insn): fix prototype
Installed on the
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:34 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> Yes, it's documented that there is still some work to do for cross builds,
> however a cross build for gotools currently fails.
>
> The toplevel make always passes the GOC variable in the environment,
> overwriting
>
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 18:24:35 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Chung-Lin, would you please have a look at the following (on
> gomp-4_0-branch)? Also, anyone else got any ideas off-hand?
>
> PASS: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/data-2.c
> -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_nvidia=1
Hi!
Ping...
On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:54:07 +0200, I wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 10:18:14 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 11:39:10AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > > On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:43:49 +0200, Jakub Jelinek
> > > wrote:
> >
101 - 119 of 119 matches
Mail list logo