On 2/20/2016 4:08 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
Sorry, but I don't like this example at all.
First the new example is essentially academic and useless,
When used within a function, basic asm:
- causes difficulties for optimizers
- produces incompatibilities with other compilers
- has semantics th
I've committed the following patch as obvious:
* tree-chkp.c (chkp_mark_invalid_bounds_walker): Initialize
variable.
diff --git a/gcc/tree-chkp.c b/gcc/tree-chkp.c
index d3119c642f33..3fba12c2ae46 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-chkp.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-chkp.c
@@ -895,7 +895,7 @@ chkp_mark_inv
On 2016-02-02, Arkadiusz Drabczyk wrote:
> On 2016-02-02, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
>> I see that the documentation of -l does need to be updated to mention
>> .so files, but I think your patch doesn't go far enough. It's already
>> confusing because that sentence says "The only difference is...
Thank you David for your response. I will keep all that in mind from next patch.
On 21 February 2016 at 03:37, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-01-30 at 19:05 +0530, Prasad Ghangal wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> This is my first proposed patch for
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17896. I
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the Swedish team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/sv.po
(This file, 'gcc-6.1-b20160131.sv.po',
