On Fri, 25 Nov 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Here is an attempt to fix a couple of bugs in gimple-ssa-sprintf.c.
> First of all, it assumes size_t is always the same as uintmax_t, which
> is not necessarily the case.
> Second, it uses static tree {,u}intmax_type_node; variables for
On Sat, 26 Nov 2016, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 11/25/2016 10:20 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Here is an attempt to fix a couple of bugs in gimple-ssa-sprintf.c.
> > First of all, it assumes size_t is always the same as uintmax_t, which
> > is not necessarily the case.
> > Second, it
On 11/25/2016 04:55 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
So IMNSHO this rtx costing change belongs in early stage 1, and should
be reverted.
Done.
Bernd
On 11/25/2016 04:55 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
So IMNSHO this rtx costing change belongs in early stage 1, and should
be reverted.
Done.
Bernd
101 - 104 of 104 matches
Mail list logo