Bootstrap and tested on linux/x86_64.
Ok for trunk?
David
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 1:56 AM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
Compiling the test case in the patch with -O2 -m32 without the fix,
the program will abort. The problem is a var decl whose address is
taken is not marked
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi,
this patch complettes the same body alias rework by removing the old same body
alias code and adding new representation. Same body aliases are now separate
function nodes that have IPA_REF_ALIAS reference to the node they are alias
of.
I am
Hi Eric,
This is the usual problem of volatile accesses not preserved under (heavy)
optimization. In Ada, we can put pragma Volatile on components of composite
types without putting it on the enclosing type itself,
if T is a non-volatile composite type with volatile components, and O is an
On Jun 15, 2011, at 6:33 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
* mh-darwin: Turn off -pie on darwin11 and later.
Also backported for gcc 4.5.4 and 4.6.1.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 5:51 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 5:31 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 6:31 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 8:57 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue,
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 8:39 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't approve the configury changes and would like to defer
to target maintainers for the target specific changes. That said,
I'm not familiar enough with the area of the patch. But yes,
it's stage1 now - so if anyone
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Richard Henderson r...@twiddle.net wrote:
I couldn't find anything terribly tricky about the conversion.
The existing push_mult pattern would service thumb1 with just
a tweak or two to the memory predicate and the length.
The existing emit_multi_reg_push
On Jun 16, 2011, at 6:11 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
Currently, scan-dump variants treat a missing dump file as a failure and
append : dump file does not exist to the test message that would be
used with pass or fail. This patch treats it as unresolved instead,
using the same test message as for
On Jun 19, 2011, at 12:43 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
Thanks. Can we get this on gcc 4.5.4 as well?
As commented in the PR, I'd have to see a confirmation that the bug exists in
gcc-4.5.x _and_ that the patch fixes it (with no regressions). That had been
previously stated for gcc-4.6.x, which is
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 02:40:59PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
On Jun 19, 2011, at 12:43 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
Thanks. Can we get this on gcc 4.5.4 as well?
As commented in the PR, I'd have to see a confirmation that the bug exists in
gcc-4.5.x _and_ that the patch fixes it (with no
Sparc is one of three users of a dwarf2out hook that I'd like to eliminate.
The other two users (arm and ia64) should be able to transition directly to
existing REG_CFA_* notes, and I will take care of those shortly. Sparc is
the only user of DW_CFA_GNU_window_save, which means we need a
if T is a non-volatile composite type with volatile components, and O is an
object of type T, are the optimizers allowed to remove the assignment O :=
O?
Good question, that I'm not really qualified to answer. Any language lawyer?
--
Eric Botcazou
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 13:35 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
This is a (possible) pre-requesite for the bitfield lowering patch,
taken from the old mem-ref branch. It introduces BIT_FIELD_EXPR
which can be used to do bitfield composition.
BIT_FIELD_EXPR a, b, C1, C2 is equivalent to computing
On Jun 19, 2011, at 4:24 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
if T is a non-volatile composite type with volatile components, and O is an
object of type T, are the optimizers allowed to remove the assignment O :=
O?
Good question, that I'm not really qualified to answer. Any language lawyer?
I'd like
14 matches
Mail list logo
