Otherwise, OK as far as x86 is concerned, but you will need separate
approval for middle-end part.
Hi guys, this is a ping
Could anybody from middle-end please have a look?
Thanks, K
Denis Chertykov schrieb:
This patch adds a new file ./gcc/doc/avr-mmcu.texi that lists all valid
-mmcu= settings and replaces the respective text in invoke.texi by
@include avr-mmcu.texi
Up to now, there is no complete list of -mmcu= options, and a list is
hard to maintain by hand because it
On 23 April 2012 04:10, Jeffrey Yasskin wrote:
Could you try to get this into mainline instead of just the google
branches? In http://gcc.gnu.org/PR52538, Jonathan sounded like he'd
consider accepting it.
I think it's useful, but I can't approve front-end patches.
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
i386 maintainers - Is this patch ok?
Has the community reached the consensus on how this kind of
functionality has to be implemented? I have followed the discussion a
bit, but IIRC, there was no clear decision. Without
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/27/12 09:37, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Now, in this particular case, there might be another option to
avoid this hassle completely: I understand that this UNSPEC is
simply a magic marker to make the address use the
2012-04-16 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz
* expr.c (expand_expr_real_1): Remove setting parent's alias set for
temporaries created for a bitfield (reverting revision 122014).
OK, thanks.
--
Eric Botcazou
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 11:32 -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 6:58 PM, William J. Schmidt
wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
This enhances constant folding for division by complex and vector
constants. When -freciprocal-math
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi,
when building Mozilla we ICE in expr_invariant_in_loop_p walking ARRAY_REF,
because one of the
fields is NULL (that is allowed)
Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, OK?
Ok with breaking the like before - lines need to be less than 80
columns.
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
This patch fixes ICE in adjust_bool_pattern, trueval in that case has
the vector type's element type, which is full precision of mode,
so when we see a smaller precision, we need to use build_nonstandard_type.
Bootstrapped/regtested on
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Greta Yorsh greta.yo...@arm.com wrote:
Here is a patch to fix the failing test gcc.dg/pr52283.c.
Adding the missing dg-warning and dg-options.
OK?
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2012-04-20 Greta Yorsh greta.yo...@arm.com
*
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Richard
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Peter Bergner berg...@vnet.ibm.com wrote:
We're still hitting the overzealous assert identified in PR49246 that is
looking for empty LTO partitions, even after the change to a checking assert.
How about we backport Honza's mainline patch that stops the creation
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Andrew Pinski pins...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I noticed a missed simple optimization on the tree level where the
and expression could be commoned out.
This patch implements the optimization in tree-ssa-forwprop.c. I
thought it would be good to get it in even
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 6:06 AM, Andrew Pinski
andrew.pin...@caviumnetworks.com wrote:
This time with the patch and describing what the bug was. The problem
was defcodefor_name does not always set arg1 and arg2. This fixes it
so it is always set to NULL if they don't exist.
Ok with ...
+
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Jim Meyering j...@meyering.net wrote:
I see that no one responded when I posted this in February.
Ok to commit, now?
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
2012-02-24 Jim Meyering meyer...@redhat.com
* genattrtab.c (gen_attr): Avoid NULL-deref after diagnosing
You do know that at least rtl hoisting is dependent upon calls_setjmp being
set, right? :-(
Sure, clearly a straightforward dependency. ;-)
This part breaks my port. I think you read the comment and thought it was
exhaustive, I don't believe it is.
I think it should, though.
This fixes a typo.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied to trunk.
Richard.
2012-04-23 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR c/53060
* c-typeck.c (build_binary_op): Fix typo.
* gcc.dg/pr53060.c: New testcase.
Index: gcc/c-typeck.c
Hi,
tested x86_64-linux, committed.
Paolo.
///
2012-04-23 Chris Jefferson ch...@bubblescope.net
PR testsuite/53046
* testsuite/25_algorithms/stable_partition/mem_check.cc: Fix size
of array A.
*
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Jay Foad jay.f...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 April 2012 16:54, Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz wrote:
two days ago I talked to Richi on IRC about the functions to determine
the expected alignment of objects and pointers we have and he
suggested that
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 08:38:41PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
Per request from IBM...
* config/s390/s390.h (LINK_SPEC): Remove, no longer needed.
(LIBSTDCXX): Change to CPP2.
Ok.
Bye,
-Andreas-
if-conversion fails to free a basic-block predicates (notably that
of the latch).
Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, testing in progress.
Richard.
2012-04-23 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR tree-optimization/53070
* tree-if-conv.c (combine_blocks): Free
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Ollie Wild a...@google.com wrote:
Add new option, -Wreserved-user-defined-literal.
Just shorten it to -Wliteral-suffix.
This option, which is enabled by default, causes the preprocessor to warn
when a string or character literal is followed by a ud-suffix
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis
g...@integrable-solutions.net wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Ollie Wild a...@google.com wrote:
Add new option, -Wreserved-user-defined-literal.
Just shorten it to -Wliteral-suffix.
I chose -Wreserved-user-defined-literal because
Hi,
I've re-tested the patch from:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01819.html
on s390x and x86_64.
Ok for mainline?
Bye,
-Andreas-
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Ollie Wild a...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis
g...@integrable-solutions.net wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Ollie Wild a...@google.com wrote:
Add new option, -Wreserved-user-defined-literal.
Just shorten it to
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 11:33 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Peter Bergner berg...@vnet.ibm.com wrote:
We're still hitting the overzealous assert identified in PR49246 that is
looking for empty LTO partitions, even after the change to a checking
assert.
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:50:51PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012, Martin Jambor wrote:
Hi,
two days ago I talked to Richi on IRC about the functions to determine
the expected alignment of objects and pointers we have and he
suggested that
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis
g...@integrable-solutions.net wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Ollie Wild a...@google.com wrote:
Do you still want me to shorten in?
yes.
Done. Updated patch attached.
Ollie
commit 3f53671fb7fc7811277f047e7914f78e127031a6
Author:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Ollie Wild a...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis
g...@integrable-solutions.net wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Ollie Wild a...@google.com wrote:
Do you still want me to shorten in?
yes.
Done. Updated patch
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012, Martin Jambor wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:50:51PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012, Martin Jambor wrote:
Hi,
two days ago I talked to Richi on IRC about the functions to determine
the expected alignment of objects and pointers
Hello!
2011-11-17 Andreas Krebbel andreas.kreb...@de.ibm.com
* reload.c (find_reloads): Change the loop nesting when trying an
alternative with swapped operands.
I would just like to point out that constran_operands will have
problems to re-recognize alternative with swapped
On 23 April 2012 14:30, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
Well, CCP simply tracks known-bits and derives the alignment
value from that. If tem -tem computes as zero that means
val-mask.low is all zeros.
Doesn't that mean that all bits are known? So you could set:
pi-align = 1 32;
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 11:09 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 11:32 -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 6:58 PM, William J. Schmidt
wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
This enhances constant folding for
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012, Jay Foad wrote:
On 23 April 2012 14:30, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
Well, CCP simply tracks known-bits and derives the alignment
value from that. If tem -tem computes as zero that means
val-mask.low is all zeros.
Doesn't that mean that all bits are
The vectorizer ends up emitting tons of
D.1234 = 0;
if (D.1234 != 0)
tests. Those do not get cleaned up by the cfg-cleanup run after it
but only during the next constant propagation pass. Easily fixed
by avoiding not necessary temporary stmts as follows.
Bootstrapped on
On 04/20/2012 01:57 PM, Dinar Temirbulatov wrote:
Here is the patch that adds support for divide 64-bit by constant for
32-bit target machines, this patch was tested on arm-7a with no new
regressions, also I am not sure on how to avoid for example i686
targets since div operation there is fast
Tom Here is a new patch for gcc.
Tom I still haven't updated the src side, but there's little to do there
Tom that isn't already done in this patch.
Tom Ok?
Tom Ping.
Tom Ping.
This is the third ping.
Please review the patch.
There are two choices:
1. Approve the original patch, adding a
Uros Bizjak wrote:
2011-11-17 Andreas Krebbel andreas.kreb...@de.ibm.com
* reload.c (find_reloads): Change the loop nesting when trying an
alternative with swapped operands.
I would just like to point out that constran_operands will have
problems to re-recognize alternative
Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/27/12 09:37, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Now, in this particular case, there might be another option to
avoid this hassle completely: =A0I understand that this UNSPEC is
simply a magic marker to
On 22/04/12 23:20, Michael Hope wrote:
Change the dynamic linker path for ARM hard float executables.
Matches the path discussed and agreed on last week[1]. Carlos will
follow up with the matching patch to GLIBC[2]. I'm happy to if he's
busy.
OK for trunk?
-- Michael
[1]
Vladimir Makarov wrote:
I have a mixed feeling with the patch. I've tried it on SPEC2000 on
x86/x86-64 and ARM. Model algorithm generates bigger code up to 3.5%
(SPECFP on x86), 2% (SPECFP on 86-64), and 0.23% (SPECFP on ARM) in
comparison with the current algorithm. It is slower too.
On 04/23/2012 12:17 AM, Naveen H. S wrote:
Some of my colleagues here do have checkin rights but not me.
I have now requested for checkin after approval rights.
Is this ok?
Great. I approved it this morning and it looks like your account was
created soon thereafter. Please add yourself to the
2012-04-20 Andreas Krebbel andreas.kreb...@de.ibm.com
* recog.c (insn_invalid_p): Add IN_GROUP parameter and use
validate_change to add clobbers if IN_GROUP is nonzero.
(verify_changes): Set IN_GROUP parameter to true.
* recog.h (insn_invalid_p): Add IN_GROUP
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Ulrich Weigand uweig...@de.ibm.com wrote:
2011-11-17 Andreas Krebbel andreas.kreb...@de.ibm.com
* reload.c (find_reloads): Change the loop nesting when trying an
alternative with swapped operands.
I would just like to point out that
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
i386 maintainers - Is this patch ok?
Has the community reached the consensus on how this kind of
functionality has to be implemented? I have
This patch to the libgo Makefile makes sure that the directory where we
place a .o file exists before we try to use it. Bootstrapped on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Committed to mainline and 4.7 branch.
Ian
diff -r e746e3770f15 libgo/Makefile.am
--- a/libgo/Makefile.am Sun Apr 22 13:07:04 2012
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
i386 maintainers - Is this patch ok?
Has the community reached the consensus on how this kind of
functionality has to be implemented? I have
Uros Bizjak wrote:
I don't have any problems with proposed order, but in my failed
attempt to convert x86 to post-reload compare elimination,
constrain_operands failed to recognize generated combined add+compare
pattern, when commutative matched operands were swapped (e.g. the
perfectly
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
this is second part of cleanup of the callgraph/varpool reachability code.
As I wrote in previous email, the callgraph was originally written with
reachability code built in. This code was used by non-unit-at-a-time (to
On 04/23/2012 11:42 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Vladimir Makarov wrote:
I have a mixed feeling with the patch. I've tried it on SPEC2000 on
x86/x86-64 and ARM. Model algorithm generates bigger code up to 3.5%
(SPECFP on x86), 2% (SPECFP on 86-64), and 0.23% (SPECFP on ARM) in
comparison with the
So, apart from the type of the flag, are there any other comments on
the patch? Is the approach acceptable?
On 21 April 2012 17:51, Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 04:26:32PM
Hello Everyone,
This patch is for the Cilkplus branch affecting the C and C++ compilers.
This patch fixes a bug that occurs when low-cost annotations is enabled. The
bug only occurs when the user is using an assembler later than 2.20.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
Index: gcc/final.c
The version of 'find' in the GCC farm does not traverse symlinked
directories unless they have a trailing slash.
OK?
2012-04-23 Manuel López-Ibáñez m...@gcc.gnu.org
* contrib/compare_tests: Append '/' to make 'find' traverse
symlinked directories.
compare_tests.diff
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
i386 maintainers - Is this patch ok?
Has the community reached the consensus on how this kind of
functionality has to be implemented? I have followed the discussion a
bit, but IIRC, there was no clear decision.
On 04/16/12 11:15, Torvald Riegel wrote:
Richard, Andrew,
I had a look at libatomic yesterday, focusing primarily on
synchronization issues in it. Here are some comments. And I think
there is a bug in it too. Notes are in no particular order. Let me know
what you think.
- seq_cst
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
* config/i386/i386.c (build_processor_features_struct): New function.
(build_processor_model_struct): New function.
(make_var_decl): New function.
(get_field_from_struct): New function.
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 22:54, Ollie Wild a...@google.com wrote:
Add new option, -Wreserved-user-defined-literal.
This option, which is enabled by default, causes the preprocessor to warn
when a string or character literal is followed by a ud-suffix which does
not begin with an underscore.
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Ulrich Weigand uweig...@de.ibm.com wrote:
Uros Bizjak wrote:
I don't have any problems with proposed order, but in my failed
attempt to convert x86 to post-reload compare elimination,
constrain_operands failed to recognize generated combined add+compare
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
This would be for google/main, right? It does not seem fit for
google/integration.
It needs to be in google/integration because it blocks nearly all of
our code from compiling with -std=gnu++11, and there's no way to
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Michael Hope michael.h...@linaro.org wrote:
Change the dynamic linker path for ARM hard float executables.
Matches the path discussed and agreed on last week[1]. Carlos will
follow up with the matching patch to GLIBC[2]. I'm happy to if he's
busy.
I'm
On 04/23/12 08:27, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Ulrich, can you please provide some guidelines on how you think this
proposed functionality should be implemented?
Well, you do not *have* to have a keyword for a special address space.
One possible implementation might be:
- You define an
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
i386 maintainers - Is this patch ok?
Has the community reached
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
i386 maintainers - Is this patch ok?
Has the community reached the consensus on how this kind of
functionality has to be implemented? I have
This patch to the Go frontend corrects the handling of negative zero
when using untyped constants. Go's untyped constants are ideal floating
point numbers, and don't have negative zero or infinity or NaN. The Go
frontend was incorrectly representing the negative of zero as a negative
zero, since
On 4/23/12 3:53 PM, Ollie Wild wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Diego Novillodnovi...@google.com wrote:
This would be for google/main, right? It does not seem fit for
google/integration.
It needs to be in google/integration because it blocks nearly all of
our code from compiling
On 04/23/2012 03:29 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
- load_n.c:
- I'm concerned about the CAS on read-only mprotected pages?
Why again do we think this is safe? Does the standard explicitly
allow this? Or should we just use a lock in this case?
Andrew, you had a bit of
The following patch makes GCC bootstrap on PA-RISC successful.
Committed as rev. 186724.
2012-04-23 Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com
* targhooks.h (default_different_addr_displacement_p): Declare.
* targhooks.c (default_different_addr_displacement_p): New
Hello!
Based on discussion at [1], there was an oversight when r/r/0
alternative was added to add*_1 patterns. This alternative should also
be added to other add*_X patterns, otherwise combined add+compare
patterns won't be matched post-reload.
2012-04-23 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:41 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 6:06 AM, Andrew Pinski
andrew.pin...@caviumnetworks.com wrote:
This time with the patch and describing what the bug was. The problem
was defcodefor_name does not always set arg1 and
Hi,
this work from Daniel implements the missing
std::is_nothrow_destructible trait and implements LWG 2049. Tested
x86_64-linux, committed to mainline.
Thanks,
Paolo.
2012-04-23 Daniel Krugler daniel.krueg...@googlemail.com
* include/std/type_traits
On 24 April 2012 03:35, Richard Earnshaw rearn...@arm.com wrote:
On 22/04/12 23:20, Michael Hope wrote:
Change the dynamic linker path for ARM hard float executables.
Matches the path discussed and agreed on last week[1]. Carlos will
follow up with the matching patch to GLIBC[2]. I'm happy
The Go spec calls for the precision of untyped floating point constants
to use 256 bits, but gccgo was only using 128 bits. This patch fixes
that. This required adjusting one of the tests so that a floating point
expression remains an integer as required. Bootstrapped and ran Go
testsuite on
On 4/23/12, Andrew MacLeod amacl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/23/2012 03:29 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
- load_n.c:
- I'm concerned about the CAS on read-only mprotected pages?
Why again do we think this is safe? Does the standard
explicitly allow this? Or should we just
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
Great, thanks. Patch is OK with the ChangeLog entries filled-in. Not sure
if you'd rather wait for the trunk commit to go in, though. It may be better
to put this version in google/integration and deal with the
Hi!
If a user decl conflicts with a use of a section without a decl
(usually rtx constant), then we can ICE in get_section.
This patch fixes it, to print the error that has been printed in older gcc
versions. Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux,
ok for trunk/4.7?
2012-04-23
Hi!
My PR52533 patch fixed unsigned comparisons, but not signed ones
where the maximum is different.
Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux,
ok for trunk?
2012-04-23 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
PR tree-optimization/53058
* tree-vrp.c
Hi!
output_addressed_constants isn't able to output constants addressed
with MEM_REFsomething, X and similarly compute_reloc_for_constant
doesn't handle it. Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and
i686-linux, ok for trunk/4.7?
2012-04-23 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
On 04/23/12 16:03, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
PR middle-end/53084
* varasm.c (compute_reloc_for_constant): Handle ADDR_EXPR
of MEM_REF.
(output_addressed_constants): Likewise.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr53084.c: New test.
Ok.
r~
On 04/23/12 15:57, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
2012-04-23 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
PR middle-end/52999
* varasm.c (get_section): Don't ICE for section conflicts with
built-in section kinds.
Ok everywhere.
r~
On Apr 23, 2012, at 12:12 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
The version of 'find' in the GCC farm does not traverse symlinked
directories unless they have a trailing slash.
OK?
Ok.
On 04/23/2012 11:36 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
this work from Daniel implements the missing
std::is_nothrow_destructible trait and implements LWG 2049. Tested
x86_64-linux, committed to mainline.
Oops. These improvements leads to tidier diagnostics for noexcept15.C
and I have to adjust it
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
i386 maintainers - Is this patch ok?
Has the community reached the
Richard Sandiford wrote:
Index: gcc/config/mips/gnu-user.h
===
--- gcc/config/mips/gnu-user.h (revision 186580)
+++ gcc/config/mips/gnu-user.h (working copy)
@@ -45,8 +45,10 @@
/* A standard GNU/Linux mapping.
This fixes two more occurrences per Rainer's earlier observation.
Installed.
Gerald
Index: changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-3.4/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.158
diff -u -3 -p -r1.158 changes.html
---
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
The addition of -ftree-pre-partial-partial is ok if you change its name to
-ftree-partial-pre and add documentation to invoke.texi.
...and the GCC 4.8 release notes (gcc-4.8/changes.html). ;-)
Gerald
On 21 April 2012 00:57, Dinar Temirbulatov dtemirbula...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Here is the patch that adds support for divide 64-bit by constant for
32-bit target machines, this patch was tested on arm-7a with no new
regressions, also I am not sure on how to avoid for example i686
targets
Per request from IBM...
* config/s390/s390.h (LINK_SPEC): Remove, no longer needed.
(LIBSTDCXX): Change to CPP2.
Ok.
Bye,
-Andreas-
Thanks! Committed.
This patch to the Go compiler issues error messages for some invalid
uses of ... in function calls. Bootstrapped and ran Go testsuite on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Committed to mainline and 4.7 branch.
Ian
diff -r a69e43eba4d7 go/expressions.cc
--- a/go/expressions.cc Mon Apr 23 14:35:45 2012
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 1:03 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi!
output_addressed_constants isn't able to output constants addressed
with MEM_REFsomething, X and similarly compute_reloc_for_constant
doesn't handle it. Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 07:56:11AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 1:03 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi!
output_addressed_constants isn't able to output constants addressed
with MEM_REFsomething, X and similarly compute_reloc_for_constant
doesn't
90 matches
Mail list logo
